期刊文献+

基于影响力产生模型的替代计量指标分层研究 被引量:35

Stratification of Altmetrics Indicators Based on Impact Generation Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 旨在通过对替代计量指标进行分层,来实现替代计量指标研究的系统化。首先,描述了影响力愿景的变化,揭示了学者影响力的多维属性。然后,基于多个实证研究,提出影响力产生模型,由三个基本模块组成,分别是知名度模块、交流模块和影响力模块。在该模型中,影响力产生过程与底层的认知过程平行,包括感知层、社交媒体层和应用层。模型显示,知名度可以转化成影响力,影响力对知名度有马太效应作用。同时,交流会促进知名度和提高影响力。最后,结合影响力产生模型、投入程度理论和现有分类体系对替代计量指标进行分层,该分层能澄清不同分组替代计量指标间的逻辑关系,揭示特定指标间的转化关系,有助于统一集成者收集数据的标准,理解替代计量学在改变现有蓝图中的贡献和用于阐释替代计量学与传统文献计量学的关系。 The research is aimed at making altmetrics indicators more systematic via stratification of altmetrics indicators. Firstly, the changing vision of altmetrics was depicted and the multi-faceted nature of scholar's impact was revealed. Secondly, based on multiple empirical studies, the impact generation model was proposed, which comprises three modules of popularity module, communication module and impact module. In the model, impact generation process is parallel to underlying cognition process that consists of perception level, social media level and application level. It is found that popularity can be transformed into impact, and impact has Mattew's effect on pop- ularity. Meanwhile, communication will improve popularity and augment the impact. Lastly, combined with impact generation model, level of engagement theory and existing classifications, prevailing altmetrics indicators are stratified. The stratification clarifies the logical relationship between groups of altmetrics indicators, reveals the transformation relationship between specific indicators, helps unify the aggregators" standards in collecting data, is beneficial for understanding the contribution of altmetrics in shaping the current landscape, and can be used to illustrate the relationship between altmetrics and traditional bibliometrics.
出处 《情报杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期53-58,共6页 Journal of Intelligence
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助重点项目"替代计量学理论与实证研究"(编号:2014104010201)研究成果之一
关键词 替代计量学 替代计量学指标 影响力产生模型 altmetrics altmetrics indictors impact generation model
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Priem J, Taraborelli D, Groth P, et al. Altrnetrics a Manifesto [ EB/OL ]. [ 2015-01-02 ]. http ://altmetrics. org/manifesto/. 被引量:1
  • 2邱均平,余厚强.论推动替代计量学发展的若干基本问题[J].中国图书馆学报,2015,41(1):4-15. 被引量:103
  • 3Lapinski S, Piwowar H, Priem J. Riding the Crest of the Altmet- tics Wave How Librarians Can Help Prepare Faculty for the Next Generation of Research Impact Metrics [ J ]. College & Research Libraries News,2013,74(6) :292-300. 被引量:1
  • 4Alperin J P. Ask Not What Altmetrics Can Do for You,but What Altmetrics Can Do for Developing Countries [ J ]. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013,39(4) :18-21. 被引量:1
  • 5Bornmann L. Alternative Metrics in Scientometrics:a Meta-anal- ysis of Research Into Three Altmetrics [EB/OL]. [ 2014 - 12 - 28 ]. http ://arxiv. org/abs/1407. 8010. 被引量:1
  • 6Noorden R V. Twitter Buzz About Papers Does not Mean Cita- tions Later [ EB/OL ]. [ 2014 - 12 - 19 ]. http://www, nature. corn/news/twitter-buzz - about - papers - does - not - mean - cita- tions-later- 1. 14354. 被引量:1
  • 7Bollen J, Van de sompel H, Smith JA, et al. Toward Alternative Metrics of Journal Impact: a Comparison of Download and Cita-tion Data [ J ]. Information Processing & Management, 2005,41 (6) :1419-1440. 被引量:1
  • 8Moed H F. Statistical Relationships Between Downloads and Ci- tations at the Level of Individual Documents Within a Single Journal[ J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Sci- ence and Technology,2005,56 ( 10 ) : 1088-1097. 被引量:1
  • 9Priem J, Piwowar H A, Hemminger B M. Altmetrics in the Wild: Using Social Media to Explore Scholarly Impact[ OL]. [ 2014-9 - 17 ]. http ://arxiv. org/abs/1203. 4745. 被引量:1
  • 10Analytics P. Overview: Plum Metrics [ EB/OL ]. [ 2014 - 12 - 15 ]. http ://www. plumanalytics, corn/metrics, html. 被引量:1

二级参考文献77

  • 1Piwowar H. Altmetrics: Value All Research Products[J]. Nature, 2013, 493(7431): 159-159. 被引量:1
  • 2Adie E, Roe W. Ahmetric: Enriching Scholarly Content with Article-level Discussion and Metrics. [J]. Learned Publishing, 2013, 26(1): 3-5. 被引量:1
  • 3Galligan F, Dyas-correia S, Altmetrics: Rethinking the Way We Measure[J]. Serials Review, 2013, 39(1): 56-61. 被引量:1
  • 4Konkiel S. Altmetrics: a 21st Century Solution to Determining Research Quality[J]. Online Searcher, 2013(8): 12-16. 被引量:1
  • 5Thelwall M, Haustein S, Larivi e re V, et al. Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services[J]. Plos One, 2013, 8(5): e64841. 被引量:1
  • 6Mounce R. Open Access and Ahmetrics: Distinct but Complementary[J]. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 39(4): 14-17. 被引量:1
  • 7Ovadia S. When Social Media Meets Scholarly Publishing[J]. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 2013, 32(3): 194-198. 被引量:1
  • 8Taylor M. Exploring the Boundaries: How Ahmetrics Can Expand Our Vision of Scholarly Communication and Social Impact[J]. Information Standards Quarterly, 2013, 25: 27-32. 被引量:1
  • 9Mohammadi E, Thelwall M. Assessing Non- standard Article Impact Using F1000 Labels[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 97(2): 383-395. 被引量:1
  • 10Bollcn J, Van de sompel H, Smith J A, et al. Toward Alternative Metrics of Journal Impact: a Comparison of Download and Citation Data[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2005, 41 (6): 1419-1440. 被引量:1

共引文献142

同被引文献473

引证文献35

二级引证文献243

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部