期刊文献+

PTGD与腹腔镜胆囊切除序贯微创治疗高危急性胆囊炎疗效分析 被引量:15

Percutaneous gallbladder puncture drainage and laparoscopic cholecystectomy as sequential minimally invasive treatment for patients with high-risk acute cholecystitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流术(PTGD)与腹腔镜胆囊切除(LC)序贯微创治疗高危急性胆囊炎(AC)的疗效。方法对76例高危AC患者根据就诊时患者全身状况、心肺功能及胆囊B超检查结果 ,分别采用PTGD加延期LC治疗(36例,为PTGD组)及同期直接LC治疗(40例,为Non-PTGD组),观察并比较两组患者LC手术时间、术中失血量、中转开腹率、术后并发症发生率及住院时间。结果 PTGD组手术时间、住院时间均明显短于Non-PTGD组(t=1.96、1.84,均P<0.05);PTGD组术中失血量明显少于Non-PTGD组(t=2.03,P<0.05);PTGD组中转开腹率、术后并发症发生率均明显低于Non-PTGD组(x^2=6.74、6.97,P<0.05)。结论 PTGD与LC序贯微创治疗高危AC疗效确切、安全,值得临床推广。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous gallbladder puncture drainage (PTGD) and laparo- scopic cholecystectomy (LC) as sequential minimally invasive treatment for patients with high-risk acute cholecystitis(AC). Methods Seventy six AC patients were divided into two groups: 36 cases were treated with LC after PTGD (PTGD group) and 40 cases directly received LC treatment (non-PTGD group) based on the general condition, heart and lung function and B ultrasound results. Results The duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay in PTGD group were sig- nificantly less than those in non-PTGD group (t = 1.96, 2.03, 1.84, all P〈0.05). Laparotomy rate and postoperative complications rate in PTGD group were significantly lower than those in non-PTGD group (x^2 = 6.74 and 6.97, both P〈0.05). Conclusion The efficacy and safety of PTGD and LC sequential minimally-invasive treatment for high-resk AC patients are satisfectory.
出处 《浙江医学》 CAS 2015年第6期488-490,共3页 Zhejiang Medical Journal
基金 温州市科技局项目(Y20140130)
关键词 腹腔镜 胆囊切除 经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流术 急性胆囊炎 Laparoscopic;Cholecystectomy;Percutaneous gallbladder puncture and drainage;Acute cholecystitis
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Stanzani G, Virgilio E, Badiali M. Clinical correlation between Tre- ponema pallidum infection and agenesis of the gallbladder [J]. Braz J infect Dis, 2012, 16(5): 500. 被引量:1
  • 2Sankarankutty A, Luz L T, Campos T D, et al. Uncomplicated a- cute cholecystitis: early or delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J]? Rev Col Bras Cir,2012, (5): 436-440. 被引量:1
  • 3Demarchi M S, Regusci L, Fasolini F. Electrocardiographic chang- es and false-positive troponin I in a patient with acute cholecysti- tis[J]. Case Rep Gastroenterol, 2012, 6(2): 410-414. 被引量:1
  • 4Minami Y, Kudo M. Hepatocellular carcinoma with obstructive jaundice: endoscopic and percutaneous biliary drainage[J]. Dig Dis, 2012, 30(6): 592-597. 被引量:1
  • 5Loberant N, Notes Y, Eitan A, et al. Comparison of early outcome from transperitoneal versus transhepatic percutaneous choiecys- tostomy [J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2010, 57(97): 12-17. 被引量:1
  • 6Tseng L J, Tsai C C, Mo L R, et al. Palliative percutaneous tran- shepatic gallbladder drainage of gallbladder empyema before la- paroscopic cholecystectomy[J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2000, 47(34): 932-936. 被引量:1
  • 7Patel M, Miedema B W, James M A, et al. Percutaneous cholecys- tostomy is an effective treatment for high - risk patients with acute cholecystitis [J]. Am Surg,2000,66(1):33-37. 被引量:1
  • 8Itoi T, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, et al. Endoscopic transpapillary gall- bladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis in whom per- cutaneous transhepatic approach is contraindicated or anatomi- cally impossible (with video)[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2008, 68(3): 455-460. 被引量:1
  • 9Solej M, Martino V, Mao P, et ai. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis[J]. Minerva Chir, 2012, 67 (5): 381-387. 被引量:1

同被引文献91

引证文献15

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部