摘要
文章针对发现服务文献保障能力研究的不足,设计并实践超星发现、e读、Summon、Primo、EDS等网域发现服务与通用搜索引擎谷歌、谷歌学术、百度保障、Web of Science平台中国著者期刊类参考文献能力的具有统计学意义的比较,发现通用搜索引擎是提供期刊论文类参考文献的有效途径,超星发现保障外刊文献能力强于多种引进的发现服务,联合使用多种文献获取途径才能最大限度地满足科研的文献需求,并提供一种量化比较各文献获取途径保障能力的方法。
Aiming at the deficiency of research on discovery service literature＇s guarantee ability, this paper makes a comparison of literature＇s guarantee ability of journal articles referenced by Web of Science＇s China authors between web scale discovery services including Superstar Discovery, e read, Summon, Primo, EDS and general search engines including Google, Google Scholar, and Baidu. The paper pointes out that the general search engine is an effective method to get professional journal articles, domestic Superstar Discovery＇s literature guarantee ability of foreign journal articles is stronger than several kinds of foreign discovery services, and combined use of web scale discovery service and general search engine is the best way to meet the scientific research＇s references demand, and a feasible method of quantitative comparison of all kinds of literature guarantee ways＇ actual support ability is provided.
出处
《图书馆论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第5期60-67,共8页
Library Tribune
基金
河南省教育厅社会科学规划项目"百链云
e读
primo三大资源发现系统中文图书揭示能力比较研究"(项目编号:2013-GH-392)研究成果之一
关键词
发现服务
搜索引擎
文献保障能力
discovery service
search engine
literature guarantee ability
