期刊文献+

剖宫产围手术期预防性应用抗生素效果的Meta分析 被引量:7

A Meta Analysis on Effect of Prophylactic Administration of Antibiotics during Perioperation of Cesarean Section
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析和评价剖宫产围手术期预防性应用抗生素的效果。方法通过检索CBM、CNKI、WanFang Data、VIP、PubMed、Embase数据库和Cochrane图书馆对照试验中心注册库,收集1975-01月/2014-04月,国内外公开发表的关于剖宫产围手术期预防性使用抗生素的情况进行了随机或非随机对照的前瞻性研究。采用Stata 12.0软件进行Meta分析。结果最终纳入16个研究,Meta分析结果显示,术前预防性应用抗生素与断脐后应用相比较,术前组腹部切口感染、子宫内膜炎和术后总感染的发病风险较断脐组显著降低,住院时间较断脐组短,但不影响新生儿结局。结论剖宫产术前与断脐后预防性应用抗生素比较,术前组腹部切口感染、子宫内膜炎和术后总感染率的发病风险显著降低,住院时间明显缩短。 Objective To analyse and evaluate the effect of prophylactic administration of antibiotics during perioperation of cesarean section.Methods Databases from January 1975 to April 2014 of CBM,CNKI,WangFang Data,VIP,PubMed,Embase and control butter center in the Cochrane Library were searched.Published articles both at home and abroad about effect of prophylactic administration of antibiotics during perioperation of cesarean section were done prospective study using random or nonrandom trials.Analyses were conducted with STATA statistical software(version 12.0).Results Sixteen trials were included in this Meta analysis.Preoperative administration significantly reduced the risk of wound infection(RR0.63,95%CI 0.45~0.87,Z=2.83,P〈0.05),postpartum endometritis(RR0.61,95%CI 0.44~0.87,Z=2.77,P〈0.05)and maternal total infectious morbidities(RR0.71,95%CI 0.52~0.96,Z=2.19,P〈0.05).The preoperative group significantly reduced the length of hospital stay(WMD-0.13,95%CI-0.25^-0.02,Z=2.25,P=0.024),but significantly increased the postoperative highest temperature(WMD0.09,95%CI 0.007~0.172,Z=2.12,P〈0.05).Furthermore,preoperative administration of antibiotics did not significantly affect neonatal outcomes.Conclusion The evidence suggest that antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean delivery given before skin incision rather than after cord clamping decreases the incidence of wound infection,postpartum endometritis,maternal total infectious morbidities and the length of hospital stay remarkably.
出处 《华南国防医学杂志》 CAS 2014年第12期1232-1236,共5页 Military Medical Journal of South China
基金 广东省计生委(20110273 20133056) 广东药学院临床医学院教学改革项目(2013)
关键词 剖宫产 抗生素 META分析 Cesarean section Antibiotics Meta analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Higgins Jpt GS. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [Updated March 2011 ][Z].The Co- chranc Collaboration.2011. 被引量:1
  • 2Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D,et al. Melhodological index for non- randomized sludies (minors): development and validation of a new inslrument[J]. ANZ J Surg,2003,73(9) :712-716. 被引量:1
  • 3Bhattacharjee N, Saha SP, Patra KK, et al. Optimal timing ofprophylactic antibiotic for cesarean delivery: a randomized com- parative study[J].J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2013,39 (12) : 1560- 1568. 被引量:1
  • 4Cunningham FG, Leveno K J, Depalma RT, et al.Perioperative an timicrobials for cesarean delivery: before or after cord clamping [J].Obstet Gynecol, 1983,62(2) : 151-154. 被引量:1
  • 5Fejgin MD, Markov S, Goshen S,et al.Antibiotic for cesarean sec- tiom the case for "true" prophylaxis[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 1993,43 (3) : 257-261. 被引量:1
  • 6Francis C, Mumford M, Strand M L, et al.Timing of prophylactic antibiotic at cesarean section., a double-blinded, randomized trial [J].J Perinatol,2013,33(10) :759-762. 被引量:1
  • 7Kandil M, Sanad Z,Gaber W.Antibiotic prophylaxis at elective ce- sarean section., a randomized controlled trial in a low resource set- ting[J~.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2014,27 (6) : 588-591. 被引量:1
  • 8Macones GA, Cleary KL, Parry S, et al. The timing of antibiotics at cesarean., a randomized controlled trial[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2012,29(4) ~ 273-276. 被引量:1
  • 9Nokiani F, Akbari H, Rezaei M. Timing of prophylactic antibiot- ic administration in term cesarean section~ A randomized clinical trial[J]. Iranian Journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2009,71- 76. 被引量:1
  • 10Sullivan SA, Smith T, Chang E, et al. Administration of cefazolin prior to skin incision is superior to cefazolin at cord clamping in preventing postcesarean infectious morbidity~ a randomized, con- trolled trial[,J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2007,196(5) : 451-455. 被引量:1

二级参考文献28

  • 1Smaill F, Hofmeyr GJ. Antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean section [ J] . Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2002, 3:CD000933. 被引量:1
  • 2Sullivan SA, Smith T, Chang E et al. Administration of cefazolin prior to skin incision is superior to cefazolin at cord elamping in preventing postcesarean infectious morbidity: a randomized, controlled trial [J] . Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 196 (5) : 455. 被引量:1
  • 3Thigpen BD, Hood WA, Chauhan S et al. Timing of prophylactic antibiotic administration in the uninfected laboring gravida: a randomized clinical trial [J] . Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 192 (6) : 1864. 被引量:1
  • 4王枢群,医院感染学,1990年,394页 被引量:1
  • 5Henderson E,Love E J.Incidence of hospital acquired infectionsassociated with caesarean section[J].Hosp Infect,1995,29(4): 245-255. 被引量:1
  • 6Killian C A,Graffunder E MtVinciguerra T J,et al.Risk factors forsurgical-site infections following cesarean section[J].Infect Control HospEpidemiol,2001,22(10):613-617. 被引量:1
  • 7Hager R M,Daltveit A K,Hofoss D,et al.Complications of cesareandeliveries : rates and risk factors[J].Am J bstet Gynecol,2004,190(2):428-434. 被引量:1
  • 8Myles T D,Gooch J,Santolaya J.Obesity as an independent risk fac-tor for infectious morbidity in patients who undergo cesarean delivery[J].0bstet Gynecol,2002,100(5Ptl):959-964. 被引量:1
  • 9Classen D C,Evans R S,Pestotnik S L,et al.The timing of prophy-lactic administration of antibiotics and the risk of surgical-wound infec-tion[J].N Engl J Med,1992,326(5): 281-286. 被引量:1
  • 10No authors listed.ASHP therapeutic guidelines on antimicrobialprophylaxis in surgery : American Society of Health-System Pharmacists[J].Am J Health Syst Phaim,1999,56(18): 1839-1888. 被引量:1

共引文献4

同被引文献46

引证文献7

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部