期刊文献+

脱域与嵌入:另类的多点民族志——关于一项法律人类学的研究反思

Disembedding and Embedding: Alternative Multi-sited Ethnography——An Introspection of a Law Anthropology Research
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对农村女性"民转刑"案件进行了转场的人类学研究实践方式,从监狱收集案件,转场至案件发生地,再转场至最终的田野点。认为田野调查的选点既是一个动态的过程,也是研究者不断尝试和反思的过程。 The transition from civil cases to criminal cases for rural women can be adopted the field point. In the field work,the process of looking for field point was divided into three steps: including female prison,one female prisoner's hometown,and another ordinary village. In response to the concept of multi-sited ethnography,this paper endeavors to explain the difference between multi-field work and multi-sited ethnography,and explores that seeking the field point is a dynamic process and the introspection of researcher.
出处 《黔南民族师范学院学报》 2015年第2期30-34,共5页 Journal of Qiannan Normal University for Nationalities
基金 教育部青年项目"纠纷解决中的主体建构--对农村"民转刑"案件的法人类学研究"(12YJC840061) 国家社科基金青年项目"转型期社会不满情绪的法社会学研究"(12CSH013)
关键词 田野 个案 多点民族志 field case multi-sited ethnography
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1马尔库斯,乔治·E·等.作为文化批评的人类学:一个人文学科的实验时代.王铭铭、蓝达居译[M].北京:三联书店,1998. 被引量:2
  • 2博登海默.法理学——法律哲学与法律方法[M].邓正来,译.北京:华夏出版社,1987. 被引量:1
  • 3Llewelyn,K.,& E. A. Hoebel. The cheyenne way: con-flict and case law in primitive jurisprudence [ M ]. Nor-man :University of Oklahoma Press, 1941. 被引量:1
  • 4Miller,Richard E. & Austin Sarat. Grievances,claims,and disputes: Assessing the adversary culture,Law & Soci-ety Review, 1980 - 1981. 被引量:1
  • 5乔治·马库斯,满珂.十五年后的多点民族志研究[J].西北民族研究,2011(3):12-21. 被引量:45
  • 6古塔,弗格森.人类学定位:田野科学的界限与基础[c].骆建建,袁同凯,郭立新译.北京:华夏出版社.2005:28-29. 被引量:2
  • 7沃尔科特.田野工作的艺术[M].马近远,译.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2011. 被引量:2
  • 8克利福德,马库斯.写文化:民族志的诗学与政治学[C].高丙中等,译.北京:商务印书馆,2006. 被引量:1
  • 9格尔茨,克利德福.1999文化的解释[M].纳日碧力戈,译.上海人民出版社. 被引量:2
  • 10林恩.休谟.人类学家在田野——参与观察中的案例分析[C].龙非等,译.上海译文出版社,2010. 被引量:1

二级参考文献41

  • 1Barnett,Thomas P.M. 2004. The Pentagon' s New Map: War and Peace in the Twenty-First Century. New York: G. P. Putnam. 被引量:1
  • 2Carrier,James and Daniel Miller,editors. 1998. Virtualism: a New Political Economy. London: Berg. 被引量:1
  • 3Clifford,James and George E. Marcus, editors. 1986. Writing Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press. 被引量:1
  • 4Holmes, Douglas and George E. Marcus.2005a. Cultures of Expertise and the Management of Globaliza- tion: Toward the Re-functioning of Ethnography. In Global Assemblages, edited by Ong and Collier. 被引量:1
  • 5Holmes, Douglas and George E. Marcus. 2005b. " Refunctioning Ethnography: the Challenge of an Anthropology of the Contemporary' in The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, Third Edition. Edited by Norman Denzin and Yvonna Lincoln.Thousand Oaks: Sage. 被引量:1
  • 6Lassiter,Luke Eric. 2005. The Chicago Guide to Collaborative Ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 被引量:1
  • 7Marcus,George E. 1980. "Power on the Extreme Periphery: the Perspectives of Tongan Elites in the Modem World System." Pacific Viewpoint 22:48-64. 被引量:1
  • 8Marcus, George E. 1986."Contemporary Problems of Ethnography in the Modern World System," in Clif- ford and Marcus, Writing Culture. 被引量:1
  • 9Marcus, George E. 1995."Ethnography in/of the World System: the Emergence of Multi-sited Ethnogra- phy. " Annual Review of Anthropology 24:95-117. 被引量:1
  • 10Marcus George E. 1997. "The Uses of complicity in the Changing mise-en-Scene of Anthropological Fieldwork." Representations 59: 85~108. 被引量:1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部