摘要
多源流理论作为一种重要的政策议程设置理论,为《食品安全法(修订草案)》议程的设置提供了有效的分析工具。相关重要指标、焦点事件以及食品安全监管出现的新状况共同构成了"问题溪流",专家学者、政治官僚、政治团体、食品安全企业代表、技术专家等政策共同体形成了"政策溪流",公众情绪、食品安全监管权限的变化共同促进了"政治溪流"的形成。三个溪流共同作用,开启了"政策窗口"。本研究通过运用多源流理论来解释食品安全法的修订过程,为我国公共政策议程的设置提供了一种解释视角。不足之处在于该理论作为西方公共政策分析的重要工具,在解释中国公共政策过程中不可避免地存在局限性。
As an important policy agenda-setting theory, the Multiple Streams Model can give us an effective instrument to analyze the amendment of Food Safety Law. Relevant key indicators, focus events and the new situation emerging food safety supervision together constitute the ＂problem stream＂, and the experts and scholars, political bureaucracy, political parties, food safety business representatives, technical experts and other policy community formed a ＂policy stream＂. The public mood and changes on food safety regulatory authority together make the formation of ＂political stream＂. Three streams together, jointly lead to the openness of ＂policy of window＂. This research analyzes the amendment of the Food Safety Law with the Multiple Streams Model, and it provides an explanatory perspective for the agenda setting in the policy. As an important analysis tool for western public policy the shortcoming also exists, it inevitably has some limitations on the interpretation of Chinese public policy process.
出处
《生态经济》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第5期179-182,共4页
Ecological Economy
基金
2013年上海高校青年教师培养资助计划项目"风险社会视域下的公共政策执行机制研究"(ZZGJD13051)
教育部人文社会科学研究课题"风险规制视域下我国政府应急管理回应模式研究"(12YJC820037)
上海工程技术大学2013年博士科研启动基金项目"风险社会下公共政策执行的治理困境及优化策略"(校启2013-22)
