期刊文献+

呼和浩特市生活饮用水中亚硝酸盐的危害风险评估 被引量:4

Risk assessment on hazard factor of nitrite in drinking water of Hohhot City
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以呼和浩特市生活饮用水为研究对象,从危害识别、危害描述、暴露评估、风险描述4个方面对水中亚硝酸盐的危害进行风险评价,确定其风险商(QH)为40%。QH<1,说明通过饮用水途径摄入亚硝酸盐对人体健康造成风险的可能性不大。同时,以纯昆明种小鼠为试验动物,开展了亚硝酸盐亚急性毒理学试验,测定血清生化指标。结果表明:基于膳食暴露水平给药的试验组,乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、尿素(UREA)与对照组有显著性差异,肝肾功能受到一定的影响。忽略从试验动物向人群外推时的不确定性,膳食暴露水平的亚硝酸盐对人体的肝肾功能也可能产生不良的影响。 Taking drinking water of Hohhot City as the research object, a risk evaluation on the hazard factor of nitrite in water was made from four aspects such as hazard identification, hazard description, exposure assessment and risk description. The evaluation results show that the risk quotient ( QH) of nitrite in water is 40%, which indicates that the possibility that human' s intaking nitrite by drinking water causes risk to human health is little. In the meantime, taking pure Kunming mice as experimental animals, a nitrite sub acute toxicological test was made to determine the serum biochemical index. The results show that there are significant differences in the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), aspartate amino transferase (AST) , alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and urea between the experimental group, which is given nitrite according to the level of dietary exposure, and the control group. The function of liver and kidney of mice in the experimental group has been affected. Ignoring the uncertainty from the experimental animal to human, nitrite in a level of the dietary exposure maybe have bad influence to the function of human' s liver and kidney.
出处 《水资源保护》 CAS CSCD 2015年第2期55-58,共4页 Water Resources Protection
基金 内蒙古自治区农牧业科学院青年创新基金(2012QNJJN05)
关键词 生活饮用水 亚硝酸盐 风险评估 毒理学试验 呼和浩特市 drinking water nitrite risk assessment toxicology tests Hohhot City
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献17

共引文献506

同被引文献52

  • 1蒲英霞,葛莹,马荣华,黄杏元,马晓冬.基于ESDA的区域经济空间差异分析——以江苏省为例[J].地理研究,2005,24(6):965-974. 被引量:331
  • 2中国环境监测总站.HJ/T91-2002地表水和污水监测技术规范[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002. 被引量:6
  • 3上海市政工程设计研究总院.GB50013-2006室外给水设计规范[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2006. 被引量:1
  • 4袁中宝.合肥市水源地保护与水源地城镇协调发展研究[D].上海,同济大学,2007. 被引量:1
  • 5US NAS. Risk assessment in the federal government: managing the process [ M ]. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1983. 被引量:1
  • 6US EPA. Risk assessment guidance and tools [ EB/OLI [ 2013-12-22]. http://wwwepagov/risk assessment/guidance.htm. 被引量:1
  • 7SALVI O, DEBRAY B. A global view on ARAMIS, a risk assessment methodology for industries in the framework of the SEVESO II directive [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2006, 130(3): 187-199. 被引量:1
  • 8JENKINS L. Selecting scenarios for environmental disaster planning[ J] .European Journal of Operational Research, 2000, 121: 275-286. 被引量:1
  • 9ScoTr A. Environment-accident index: validation of a model[ J] .Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1998, 61(1/2/3) : 305-312. 被引量:1
  • 10国家环境保护局.HJ/T2.3—1993环境影响评价技术导则(地表水环境)[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1993. 被引量:1

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部