期刊文献+

农地三权分离改革的法学反思与批判 被引量:46

Jurisprudential Thinking and Critique on the Reform of the Separation of the Three Farmland Rights
原文传递
导出
摘要 农地所有权、农地承包权和农地经营权的三权分离,是目前经济学主导农地改革政策的形象表述。将土地承包经营权中的承包权能和经营权能,分离为承包权和经营权,不符合基本的法理。所有权是法律概念,而承包权和经营权不是法律术语,因此农地三权分离存在明显的逻辑悖论。法学家应当充分参与中央改革决策,运用法律思维界定农地的权利结构。农地三权分离的实质是土地承包经营权通过转让、转包、出租、代耕、反租倒包、联营、抵押、入股、股份合作和信托等多种方式实现流转。农地经营权本质是债权,是不动产租赁权的重要类型。基于市场在资源配置中的决定性作用,农村集体、农民和新型农业经营主体之间的法律关系,具有自治性和多元性。 The separation of the three farmland rights including the ownership, the contract rights and the management rights, is an dominant economic expression about the policies of farmland reform. The ownership is a legal concept, but the contract rights and the management rights is not, and therefore the separation of the three farmland rights have an obvious logical contradiction. Referring to the management rights of SOE, it does not conform to legal principle to deride the land contract, and management rights into the contract rights and the management rights. Jurists should have an active participant in the reform to legally define the rights structure of the farmland. The essence of the separation of the three farmland rights is to exchange the land contract and management rights by transfer, subcontract, lease, daiceng, antirent contract, association, mortgage, shares, stock cooperation and trusts and so on. There existes a self-governing and multiplex legal relationship among rural collective, peasant and the operator because that The market play a decisive role in the allocation of resources the decisive role of the market in allocating resources.
作者 申惠文
机构地区 郑州大学法学院
出处 《河北法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第4期2-11,共10页 Hebei Law Science
基金 国家社会科学基金项目<农户作为土地用益物权主体的法律困境及出路研究>(14CFX035)
关键词 土地承包经营权 承包权 经营权 新型农业经营主体 土地法学 the land contract and management rights the contract rights the management rights agricultural business entities land laws
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献88

共引文献541

同被引文献497

引证文献46

二级引证文献952

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部