摘要
目的:调查和比较学优生和"学困生"学业压力,为减轻学生的学业压力和转化"学困生"提供相应的参考依据。方法:采用问卷法和测量法选取264名"学困生"和学优生,并对其学业压力进行测量。结果:1"学困生"学业压力总分任务要求压力,竞争压力,挫折压力,期望压力和自我发展压力均比学优生大(t=-5.65,-4.80,-4.99,-5.34,-4.43,-5.20;P<0.01);2女学优生学业压力总分,竞争压力,挫折压力和期望压力比男学优生大(t=-2.05,-2.57,-2.59,-2.43;P<0.05)。女"学困生"与男"学困生"除了在挫折压力维度差异显著外(t=2.08,P<0.05),在其余各维度及其学业压力总分上性别差异均不显著。结论:1"学困生"的学业压力比学优生更大;2在学业压力方面,学优生存在性别差异,但"学困生"不存在性别差异。
Objective：To survey and compare academic stress of poor and excellence students, and af- ford corresponding reference for poor students＇conversion. Methods ：264 students were measured by ques- tionnaires. Results：① Poor students＇ academic stress was higher than excellence students on total scores of academic stress, target requirement stress, competition stress, frustration stress, expectation stress, and self development stress（ t = -5.65, -4.80, -4.99, -5.34, -4.43, -5.20 ; P 〈 0.001 ）. ② Female excellence students＇ academic stress was higher than male excellence students＇on total scores of academic stress com- petition stress, frustration stress, and expectation stress （ t = -2.05, -2.57, -2.59, -2.43 ; P 〈 0.05 ）. There were no difference between female poor students and male poor students at all aspects of academic stress except frustration stress. Conclusion： ①Poor students have higher academic stress than excellence students. ②There are gender difference between excellence students but not poor students.
出处
《中国健康心理学杂志》
2015年第4期614-617,共4页
China Journal of Health Psychology
关键词
学优生
“学困生”
学业压力
性别
Excellence students
Poor students
Academic stress
Gender
