摘要
目的：探讨不同手术方法治疗胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔的对比。方法选取2013年9月～2014年10月我院接诊的38例胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔患者，随机分为两组，20例实验组采用腹腔镜手术治疗，18例对照组采用传统开腹手术，观察两组患者的治疗效果。结果实验组患者的治疗总有效率、手术时间、术中出血量、肛门排气时间、住院时间及并发症的发生率优于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论腹腔镜手术治疗胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔的效果显著，可以有效提高治疗有效率，缩短手术时间和住院时间，降低并发症的发生率。
Objective To explore the comparison and analysis of different surgical methods of the treatment of gastroduodenal ulcer perforation. Methods Selected 38 casses of patients with gastroduodenal ulcer perforation in our hospital from September 2013 to October 2014, randomly divided into two groups,20 cases of experimental group treated by laparoscopic surgery,18 cases of control group with traditional laparotomy,observed the therapeutic effect of two groups. Results Experimental group was better than control group in total effective rate, operative time,intraoperative blood loss,length of hospital stay,anal exhaust time and the incidence of complications,the difference was statistically significant（P〈0.05）. Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery for gastric duodenal ulcer perforation is worthy of clinical promotion because of remarkable effect,effective improvement of the treatment efficiency,shorting the operation time and hospitalization time and reducing the incidence of complications.
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2015年第7期80-81,共2页
China Health Standard Management
关键词
胃十二指肠
溃疡穿孔
腹腔镜手术
传统开腹手术
Gastric and duodenal
Ulcer perforation
Laparoscopic surgery
Laparotomy surgery
