期刊文献+

Jfactor及其与传统文献计量指标的关系

The Correlation Analysis Between Jfactor and Other Informetrics Indicators
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的/意义]研究基于开放式引文数据库提出的新型期刊评价指标Jfactor以及其与传统文献计量学指标的关系,分析Jfactor的特点,并对我国期刊评价提出启示。[方法/过程]结合统计学方法,利用SPSS软件对高能物理领域期刊的指标数据进行相关性分析,主要包括Jfactor与impactfactor、5-yearimpactfactor、eigenfactorscore,同时将指标之间作比较研究。[结果/结论]相关分析结果表明,Jfactor与impactfactor相关性最强,其次是5-yearimpactfactor,与eigenfactorscore的相关性相对最弱。相对于impactfactor,Jfactor的计算数据更加透明,而且充分考虑了开放数据对论文引用的影响,对我国期刊评价具有重要的研究价值。 [Purpose/significance[ Jfactor based on open citation database is proposed to assess the journal impact. The paper aims to analyze the correlation between Jfactor and other informetrics indicators and study how to apply Jfactor into journal evaluation in China.[ Method/process] Using correlation analysis method, studied the correlation between Jfactor and other informetrics indicators, mainly including impact factor, 5 - year impact factor and eigenfactor score. [ Result/conclusion] Taking journals in high energy physics as an example, the result shows that Jfactor has the higher correlation with impact factor than 5 - year impact factor and eigenfactor score. The data that used to calculate Jfactor is more transparent and public. Jfactor combines impact factor with open data plenty and is a valuable benchmark for journal evaluation in China.
出处 《图书情报工作》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第4期93-99,共7页 Library and Information Service
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"基于科学基金项目及知识产出的研究前沿探测"(项目编号:71373260) 中国科学院西部之光联合学者项目"基于计算情报方法的甘肃省战略新兴产业技术创新竞争与发展研究"(项目编号:Y200201001)研究成果之一
关键词 Jfactor 期刊评价 相关性 计量指标 Jfactor journal evaluation correlation informetrics indicators
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Garfield E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor [ J]. Journal of the American Medical Association ,2006,295 (1) : 90 - 93. 被引量:1
  • 2Finardi U. Correlation between journal impact factor and citation performance : An experimental study [ J ]. Journal of Informetrics, 2013, 7(2) : 357 -370. 被引量:1
  • 3李建辉,王志魁,徐宏,肖志军,孙梦婕,苏洪余.自引对科技期刊影响因子作用的量化研究[J].编辑学报,2007,19(2):154-157. 被引量:61
  • 4许海云,方曙,付鑫金.基于特征向量中心度加权的期刊影响因子研究[J].情报理论与实践,2011,34(11):108-112. 被引量:17
  • 5贾志云.期刊影响因子的学科差异、领域差异以及绩效考核[J].中国科学院院刊,2009,24(5):525-529. 被引量:14
  • 6The PLoS Medicine Editors. The impact factor game: It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature[ EB/OL]. [2014 - 12 - 18 ]. http://www, ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/pmc/articles/ PMC1475651/. 被引量:1
  • 7Rossner M, Van Epps H, Hill E. Show me the data[ J]. The Jour- nal of Cell Biology,2007,179(6) :1091 - 1092. 被引量:1
  • 8San Francisco declaration on research assessment[ EB/OL]. [ 2014 - 12 - 19]. http://am, ascb. org/dora/. 被引量:1
  • 9Lozano G A, Lariviere V, Gingras Y. The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers' citations in the digital age [ J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012, 63 ( 11 ) : 2140 - 2145. 被引量:1
  • 10Francrchet M. Ten good reasons to use the EigenfactorTM metrics [ J ]. Information Processing and Management,2010,46 (5) : 555 - 558. 被引量:1

二级参考文献144

共引文献229

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部