摘要
医疗纠纷第三方调解作为一种新型的非诉讼纠纷解决方式,有效地弥补了诉讼等传统纠纷解决机制的缺陷,对高效化解医患矛盾、维护正常的医疗秩序起到了重要的作用;为了促进各种纠纷解决机制之间相互配合和协调运作,保证第三方调解与诉讼程序的有效衔接,我国立法应当设置医疗纠纷第三方调解为诉前程序,确立第三方调解协议的司法审查制度,赋予第三方调解协议法律执行的效力,建立对医疗纠纷证据的互认制度,构建第三方调解组织参与诉讼制度;遵循第三方调解合法原则、赋予第三方调解协议既判力、构建以第三方调解为核心的多元化医疗纠纷解决体系;实现第三方调解的司法化,为公平合理的解决医疗纠纷,促进医患关系的和谐发展提供司法保护。
As a new form of non-civil action settlement, the third party mediation(TPM) in the settlement of medical disputes patch up the loopholes of the conventional settlement mechanism of the civil action, and therefore functions efficiently and maintains medical order. It should be established through legislature as a procedure that precedes the civil action. The judicial review of the agreement reached through the TPM should be established, the agreement enforcement right should be given to the third party mediator, the mechanism of mutual recognition of evidence should be established, the mechanism regarding the involvement of the third party in law suits should be established, legal principles should be followed in the TPM, and the adjudged force should be given to the agreement reached by the TPM, so as to judicialize the TPM and provide judicial protection for the just and reasonable settlement of medical disputes.
出处
《苏州大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第2期50-58,191,共9页
Journal of Soochow University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
基金
四川省哲学社会科学重点研究基地--四川医事卫生法治研究中心立项资助项目"医疗纠纷第三方调解机制研究"(项目编号:YF12-Z01)的阶段性成果
关键词
医疗纠纷第三方调解
调解协议
司法确认制度
诉调衔接机制
the third party mediation in the settlement of medical disputes
TPM agreement
judicial recognition mechanism
mediation-civil action consistency
