期刊文献+

民族教育研究的教育人类学省思——以民族志文本“打造”为例 被引量:3

An Educational Anthropological Reflection on Researches of Ethnic Minority Education——Taking Ethnography Texts as Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 虽然民族教育研究几近成为我国教育人类学的代名词,但真正将人类学的研究方法运用到民族教育研究中的研究成果还相当有限,民族志文本"打造"就是其中较为突出的问题之一。部分研究中存在的选题避重就轻、方法生搬硬套、结论不合事实等问题与民族志文本"打造"的理论要求还有较大差距,造成了民族志文本撰写过程中研究问题明确具体,但人类学"深描"运用不当;文本表述生硬刻板,却很难"写文化";文本撰写未能"讲故事",很难有真正意义的追问等诸多困惑。这需要引起研究者的重视。 Ethnic Minority education research has become the code name of educational anthropology in China,but the few studies employ research methods of anthropology.There exist such problems in national education researches as:key topics are not touched,research methods are not inappropriately used,and research conclusions do not accord with the fact,etc..Consequently,the studies can't reach the standards of ethnographic text,research topics are unimportant,some anthropologic methods unnecessary,narrations rigid and storytelling not used in text writing,etc..Researches should attach importance to this issue.
作者 张善鑫
出处 《西北师大学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期69-75,共7页 Journal of Northwest Normal University(Social Sciences)
基金 全国教育科学规划项目"教育公平视野下人口较少民族教育特色研究"(DMA110315) 2014年度甘肃省高校基本科研业务费项目"西北民族地区县域内教育均衡发展研究"
关键词 民族教育研究 民族志文本 教育人类学 困惑 minority education research ethnographic text educational anthropology confusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

二级参考文献64

  • 1滕星.民族教育概念新析[J].民族研究,1998(2):23-30. 被引量:70
  • 2论少数民族教育文化背景民族差异性[J].民族教育研究,1996,7(3):13-18. 被引量:10
  • 3黄晓岚.从文化教育人类学看中国教育[J].湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,23(1):131-134. 被引量:4
  • 4Durkheim, E. 1956. Education and Sociology. Trans. S. D. Fox. Glencoe: TheFree Press. pp. 123-24. 被引量:1
  • 5Parsons. T. 1985. The School Class as A Social System: Some of Its Functions in American Society. In J. H. Ballantine, ed. , Schools and Society. A Reader in Education and Sociology, pp. 179-197. Palo Alto, CA. - Mayfield. 被引量:1
  • 6Baker, V. J. 1988. The Blackboard in the Jungle. Formal Education in Disadvantaged Rural Area. Sri Lankan Case. Netherland. Eburon Publisher. 被引量:1
  • 7Spindler, George. 1963. Education and Culture. Anthropological Approaches.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 被引量:1
  • 8Borman, Kathryn M., Amy E. Fox, and Bradley A. U. Levinson. 2000. "Cultural Production and Reproduction in Contemporary Schools. " In Bradly A. U. Levinson, ed., Schooling the Symbolic Animal. Social and Cultural Dimensions of Education, pp. 239-247. Lanham, M. D. : Rowan & Littlefield Publishers. 被引量:1
  • 9Ogbu, I.. 1981. School Ethnography: A Multilevel Approach. Anthropology and Education Quarterly 12 (1) :3-29. 被引量:1
  • 10Ogbu, I.. 1974. The Next Generation: An Ethnography of Education in An Urban Neighborhood. New York: Academic Press. 被引量:1

共引文献231

同被引文献37

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部