摘要
中华书局2004年版《续资治通鉴长编》全文移录了玉清昭应宫灾后苏舜钦诣登闻鼓院所奏《火疏》,但此文与《苏舜钦集》中的《火疏》之间不一致之处颇多。在对两者比勘时,笔者发现宋代个人撰述在从己入官、再由官入史的传递过程中,存在着明显被"整理"的痕迹,史籍中现存的资料与原作迥异之处甚多。比勘两者差异,不仅为考察宋代著述之政治文化生态提供了一认识视阈;也要求史学研究者在关注史料版本的同时,努力追寻最贴近史源的材料。唯有如此,方可获得更为信实的成果。
There were several problems in two versions of Su Shun-qin＇s memorials to the throne,which was included in Continuation of the Comprehensive Mirror of History for Aid in Government [960to1126]（ 2004） and created in the book by Su Shun-qin himself. As it was sent to the feudal official or became written history,Su Shun-qin＇s writing was obviously modified and was different from his original work. To get more faithful results,the researchers should be in pursuit of both historical version and document source.
出处
《许昌学院学报》
CAS
2015年第1期80-82,共3页
Journal of Xuchang University
关键词
《续资治通鉴长编》
苏舜钦
奏疏
史源
Continuation of the Comprehensive Mirror of History for Aid in Government [960-1126]
Su Shun-qin
memorials to the throne
document source
