期刊文献+

多巴胺联合去甲肾上腺素治疗心源性休克的疗效及安全性分析 被引量:11

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨多巴胺联合去甲肾上腺素治疗心源性休克的疗效及安全性。方法 191例心源性休克患者入选本次研究,联合用药组(n=100)应用多巴胺联合去甲肾上腺素,多巴胺组(n=91)给予多巴胺药物治疗。密切注意2组患者在治疗前后收缩压、舒张压、肌酐、每小时尿量、血浆β型脑钠肽(BNP)、左室射血分数(LVEF)等各项指标的变化和临床改善情况。结果治疗7 d后,联合用药组有较高的治疗显效率(P=0.099)和较低的死亡率(P=0.069),但差异无统计学意义。联合用药组治疗后舒张压水平较高(P=0.012)。恶性心律失常导致血流动力学不稳定的事件发生率,差异无统计学意义(P=0.710)。结论与单纯多巴胺比较,多巴胺联合去甲肾上腺素治疗心源性休克有很好的疗效和安全性,并且有降低总死亡率的趋势。 Objective To evaluate the safety and efficiency of combination of dopamine and noradrenaline for the treatment of cardiogenic shock. Methods Clinical data of 191 patients with cardiogenic shock were collected,100 patients receiving combination of dopamine and noradrenaline, while 91 patients receiving solo Dopamine treatment. The systolic pressure, diastolic pressure,creatinine, urine of every hour, Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) changes and clinical improvement of two groups were observed closely before and after treatment.Results Compared with Dopamine group, the DBP was significantly higher (P=0.012) and mortality rate was not significantly decreased (P=0.069) in patients with combination of dopamine and noradrenaline. Arrhythmic events rare was not different between groups (P=0.710). Conclusion In patients with cardiogenic shock, combination of dopamine and noradrenaline was safe and showed a non-significant low mortality rate.
出处 《当代医学》 2015年第8期139-140,共2页 Contemporary Medicine
关键词 心源性休克 多巴胺 去甲肾上腺素 安全性 Cardiogenic shock Norepinephrine Dopamine Safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献35

  • 1张少雷,孙荣青.血管升压药物在感染性休克中的应用[J].中国呼吸与危重监护杂志,2011,10(3):209-210. 被引量:10
  • 2侯立朝,计根林,熊利泽,陈绍洋,陈敏,霍婷婷,胡文能,王雅丽,汪晨,白晓光.多巴胺联合去甲肾上腺素对感染性休克患者肾脏功能的影响[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(17):1206-1208. 被引量:13
  • 3Simon Grahe JJ, Patel GP, Elpern E, et al. The safety of dopamine versus norepinephrine as vasopressor therapy in septic shock (Abstract). Chest, 2005, 128: 219S-220S. 被引量:1
  • 4Marik PE, Mohedin M. The contrasting effects of dopamine and norepinephrine on systemic and splanchnic oxygen utilization in hyperdynamic sepsis. JAMA, 1994, 272(17): 1354-1357. 被引量:1
  • 5Martin C, Papazian L, Perrin G, et al. Norepinephrine or dopamine for the treatment of hyperdynamic septic shock? Chest, 1993, 103(6): 1826-1831. 被引量:1
  • 6Ruokonen E, Takala J, Kari A, et al. Regional blood flow and oxygen transport in septic shock. Crit Care Med, 1993, 21(9): 1296-1303. 被引量:1
  • 7Martin C, Viviand X, Leone M, et al.Effect of norepinephrine on the outcome of septic shock. Crit Care Med, 2000, 28(8): 2758-2765. 被引量:1
  • 8Hamzaoui O, Georger JF, Monnet X, et al. Early administration of norepinephrine increases cardiac preload and cardiac output in septic patients with life-threatening hypotension. Crit Care, 2010, 14(4): R142. 被引量:1
  • 9Póvoa PR, Carneiro AH, Ribeiro OS, et al. Portuguese Community-Acquired Sepsis Study Group. Influence of vasopressor agent in septic shock mortality. Results from the Portuguese Community-Acquired Sepsis Study (SACiUCI study). Crit Care Med, 2009, 37(2): 410-416. 被引量:1
  • 10Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Clinical Trials Group: Low dose dopamine in patients with early renal dysfunction: a placebo controlled trial. Lancet, 2000, 356: 2139-2143. 被引量:1

共引文献62

同被引文献79

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部