期刊文献+

精神利益保护决定民事责任法不可替代

Protecting Mental Interests Making the Civil Liability Law Irreplaceable
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着现代社会保障体系的建立,民事责任法面临着存在必要性的质疑,从而似乎罹于一场空前的"生存危机"。然而,现代社会保障体系不能解决人的精神利益保护问题。精神利益保护决定民事责任法具有不可替代性。民事责任法以其道德本性为存在依据;背离道德原则对民事责任法进行解释的理论均有成立障碍;现代社会救济立法理论和实践均难以否定民事责任追偿机制及其固有功能。 With the modern social security system being established, the civil liability law has been questioned for its necessity of existence, and thereby suffered from an unparalleled "survival crisis" seemingly. However, the modern social security system cannot resolve the problem of people' s mental interests protecting. Mental interests protecting makes the civil liability law ilTeplaceable, The civil liability law lies in its morality nature; any theory could not justify itself when it interprets civil liability law against morality principle; both the modern social remedy theory and its practice are not able to deny civil liability law' s repaying mechanism and its inherent function.
作者 方乐坤
出处 《西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2015年第2期78-84,共7页 Journal of Xihua University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)
基金 2010年度教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目"民事责任体系的人文改良--以人的精神利益维护的进路"(项目批准号:10YJC820027)
关键词 精神利益保护 民事责任法 不可替代性 protecting mental interests the civil liability law irreplaceable
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Andrew Burrows. Understanding the Law of Obligations : Essays on Contract, Tort and Restitution [ M ]. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998. 被引量:1
  • 2John Cooke, David Oughton. The Common Law of Obligations [ M ]. 3th edition. London: Butterworths, Edinburgh, Dublin, 2000:155. 被引量:1
  • 3王泽鉴.侵权行为法(1)[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001.. 被引量:21
  • 4梁慧星.从近代民法到现代民法[J].律师世界,2002(5):4-8. 被引量:53
  • 5何勤华,夏菲主编..西方民法史[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2006:572.
  • 6[美]伯纳德·施瓦茨.美国法律史[M].王军.北京:法律出版社,2007. 被引量:10
  • 7尹志强.侵权行为法的社会功能[J].政法论坛,2007,25(5):153-161. 被引量:41
  • 8[法]勒内·达维.英国法与法国法,一种实质性比较[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2002.. 被引量:6
  • 9Cf Vivienne Harpwood. Principles of Tort Law [ M ]. London : Cav- endish Publishing Limited, 2000 : 14. 被引量:1
  • 10易继明.侵权行为法的道德基础(代译序)[M]//[美]格瑞尔德·J.波斯特马.哲学与侵权行为法(序言部分).陈敏,云建芳,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2005. 被引量:1

二级参考文献31

  • 1[古希腊]亚里士多德.尼各马克伦理学[M].廖申白译.北京:商务印书馆,2006. 被引量:2
  • 2Richard A. Posner. The Concept of Corrective Justice in Recent Theories of Tort Law [ J ]. The Journal of Legal Studies, 1981, (10). 被引量:1
  • 3Jules Coleman. Tort Law and Tort Theory - Preliminary Reflections on Method[ A]. Gerald J. Postema( ed. ). Philosophy and the Law of Torts [ C ]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2001. 被引量:1
  • 4Jules Coleman. The Practice of Corrective Justice[ A]. David G. Owen( ed. ). Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law [ C ]. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1995. 被引量:1
  • 5Wright. Actual Causation v. Probabilistic Linkage · The Bane of Economic Analysis[ J]. The Journal of Legal Studies, 1985, (14). 被引量:1
  • 6Weinrib. Causation and Wrongdoing[ J]. The Chicago - Kent Law Review, 1983, (63). 被引量:1
  • 7Guido Calabresi. Some Thoughts on Risk Distribution and the Law of Torts [ J ]. The Yale Law Journal, 1961, (70). 被引量:1
  • 8R. H. Coase. The Problem of Social Cost[J]. Journal of Law and Economics,1960, (3). 被引量:1
  • 9Mark A. Geistfeld. Economics, Moral Philosophy and the Positive Analysis of Tort Law [ A ]. Gerald J. Postema ( ed. ). Philosophy and the Law of Torts [ C ]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2001. 被引量:1
  • 10Gerald J. Postema. Search for An Explanatory Theory of Torts [ A ] · Gerald J. Postema ( ed. ). Philosophy and the Law of Torts [ C ]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press ,2001. 被引量:1

共引文献305

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部