期刊文献+

BECKMAN DxI 800全自动化学发光仪检测泌乳素的性能验证 被引量:3

Analytical Performance Verification of BECKMAN DxI 800 Automated Chemiluminescence Analyzer in Detecting PRL
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对BECKMAN DxI 800全自动化学发光仪检测泌乳素(PRL)的分析性能进行验证。方法参照美国临床实验室标准化协会(NCCLS)的文件,选取病人血清和质控室间质评质控品,对 PRL的批内精密度、批间精密度、准确度、线性范围等方面进行验证。结果 PRL的批内和批间精密度CV值均小于厂家声明的CV值,在允许范围内;PRL线性范围验证结果显示,a值为1.0114,r值为0.9974,均在仪器要求范围内,并具有良好的线性;PRL准确度验证结果显示,测定5份室间质评的检测结果与“靶值”的偏倚为-1.18%--7.78%,均在室间质评的测量范围之内。结论 BECKMAN DxI 800全自动化学发光仪测定PRL在精密度、准确度、线性范围等性能指标均在仪器要求范围内,符合要求,可应用于临床检测。 Objective To detect the prolactin (PRL)analytical performance verification by BECKMAN DxI 800 automated chemiluminescence analyzer.Methods According to the American Society for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS)documents,selected the patient’s serum and EQA control materials,the precision,accuracy and linearity of the BECKMAN DxI 800 automated chemiluminescence analyzer system in detecting PRL were detected.Results The CV values of intra-and inter-precision were less than manufacturer’s declaration,and within the allowable range.The validation results of linear range showed that,a value of 1.0114,r value of 0.9974,both within the requirements of the instrument,and has excellent linearity;the relative bias between the measured results and the EQA control samples at five levels was -1.18%--7.78%,both within the scope of the EQA measurement.Conclusion The BECKMAN DxI 800 automated chemiluminescence analyzer system in detecting PRL in precision,accuracy,linearity and other performance indicators were within the requirements of the instrument,tomeet the requirements,can be used in clinical testing.
出处 《现代检验医学杂志》 CAS 2015年第1期126-127,131,共3页 Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine
关键词 泌乳素 性能验证 精密度 准确度 线性范围 prolactin performance verification precision accuracy linear range
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献23

  • 1徐国宾,蒋琳.临床生物化学常规定量方法的分析性能评价[J].中华检验医学杂志,2007,30(6):718-720. 被引量:58
  • 2BRIAND PY, DECAUX O, CAILLON H, et al. Analytical per- formance of the serum free light chain assay [J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2010, 48(1): 73-79. 被引量:1
  • 3CLSI. EP15-A. User Demonstration of Performance for Precision and Accuracy[S]. 2004. 被引量:1
  • 4CLSI. EP6-A. Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Mea- surement Procedures[S]. 2003. 被引量:1
  • 5CLSI. EP9-A2. Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples[S]. 2002. 被引量:1
  • 6Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Clinical laboratory improvement amendments of 1988: final rule[S]. Fed Register, 2003: 3704. 被引量:1
  • 7National Committee tor Clinical Laboratory Standards. Evaluation of Precision Performance of Clinical Chemistry Devices: Tentatixe Guideline[ S]. 2nd ed. Document EP5-A.Wayne, Pa, NCCLS, 1999. 被引量:1
  • 8National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples: Approved Guideline [ S ]. Document EP9- A. Wayne, Pa, NCCLS, 1995. 被引量:1
  • 9Buttner J, Borth R, Boutwell JH, et al. ( IFCC Committee on Standards): Provisional recommendations on quality control ill Clinical: general principles and terminology [ J ]. Clin Chem, 1976, 22 (2) : 532- 539. 被引量:1
  • 10National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Analytical Methods: Proposed Guideline[S]. Document EP6-P. Wayne, Pa, NCCLS, 1986. 被引量:1

共引文献268

同被引文献52

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部