摘要
专家辅助人制度是近年来我国诉讼法确立的一项新制度,无论在理论研究层面,还是在立法层面,乃至实践操作层面,专家辅助人资格的认定标准和认定程序都存在不足。在域外,存在与我国专家辅助人相似的一些制度,比如英美法系的专家证人制度、美国的法院之友、英国的技术陪审员、意大利的技术顾问、日本的诉讼辅佐人制度等,这些国家在规定这些制度时都对专家的资格审查、认定设立了相应的标准和程序。笔者在借鉴域外相关国家和地区法律规定的同时,结合中国现实国情,从专家辅助人的资格认定标准、资格审查程序以及其他辅助性制度等三方面提出建议。
Expert auxiliary system is newly established by procedure laws in China in recent years. Whether at the theoretical research level, or at the legislative level, and even at the level of practice, expert auxiliary personal qualification identifying standards and procedures are quite inadequate. In the outside, there are some similar systems, such as expert witness system in Anglo-American law system, friends of the court in the United States, the British technical jury, Italy＇s technology consultant, Japan＇s lawsuit assistants, etc. These countries have established the corresponding standards and procedures of expert qualification examination and identification. In reference to the relevant laws and regulations from other countries and regions and combining with China＇s real conditions, the author will give suggestions from three aspects： the specialist aided person＇s qualification standards, qualification review procedures, and other auxiliary system.
出处
《证据科学》
CSSCI
2014年第6期698-715,共18页
Evidence Science
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"司法鉴定服务合同研究"(编号:14YJA820023)
关键词
专家辅助人
专门知识
司法鉴定
鉴定意见
专家
Assistant expert, Specialized knowledge, Judicial appraisal, Appraisal opinion, Expert
