摘要
顾钰民教授认为,"双主体说"在逻辑上、理论上存在诸多问题,并不能颠覆"主客体说",从而,与流行观点一样,把"主客体说"与"双主体说"对立起来。其实,他所说的问题并不存在。首先,把思想政治教育分为两个"过程"与两个"方面"并不矛盾,而且思想政治教育的确包含教与学两个过程;其次,"双主体说"对主体标准的界定并没有问题,主客关系不是从地位、功能与作用来界定的,而是从认识与实践关系来界定的。正因为对主客关系的误解,顾教授未能发现思想政治教育"主客体说"的真正根源,亦未能发现在不同层面"主客体说"与"双主体说"两者能够统一起来。
Professor Gu Yumin suggests that ＂double subject theory＂ has many problems both in logic and theory and cannot overturn ＂subject and object theory＂, which opposites the ＂subject object theory＂ and ＂double subject theory＂. In fact, the problems he pointed out do not really exit. Firstly, it is not a contradiction to divide the ideological and political education into two ＂process＂ and two ＂as- pects＂, and the ideological and political education does contain two process of teaching and learning. Sec- ondly, the definition of subject standard of ＂double subject theory＂ does not have problems because the relationship between subject and object is not defined by the position, function and role, but from the re- lationship between knowledge and practice. Professor Gu failed to find the real source of ＂subject and ob- ject theory＂ in ideological and political education.
出处
《教学与研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第3期82-87,共6页
Teaching and Research
关键词
主客体
双主体
主体说
对立
统一
subject and object
the double subjects
subject theory
opposition
unity
