摘要
目的：对比研究经皮肾镜微创碎石与开放取石治疗肾结石临床疗效。方法选取我院2011年10月～2013年10月间收治的82例肾结石患者，随机分为观察组和对照组，每组各41例。观察组患者给予经皮肾镜微创碎石治疗肾结石。对照组患者给予开放取石治疗肾结石。观察比较两组患者的临床疗效及并发症情况。结果观察组患者的手术创伤小，出血量少，排石效果好，并发症少，两组比较，P〈0.05，差异有统计学意义。结论经皮肾镜微创碎石较开放取石治疗肾结石临床疗效好。
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy lithotripsy and minimaly invasive open stone for the treatment of renal calculus.Methods 82 patients with renal calculus were selected in our hospital.They were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group with 41 patients in each group.The patients in the observation group were treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy minimaly invasive lithotripsy,while in the control group with nephrolithotomy.The curative effect and postoperative complications,of both groups were compared. ResultsThe operative time,after intraoperative bleeding,the stone clearance rate and the probability of complications in the observation group were significantly less than that of the control group,P〈0.05,the difference were statisticaly significant.Conclusion The observation group operation for the treatment of renal calculi has the advantages,it is worthy of further application.
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2015年第5期115-116,共2页
China Health Standard Management
关键词
经皮肾镜微创碎石
开放取石
肾结石
Minimaly invasive percutaneous renal mirror of gravel
Open lithotomy
Kidney stones
