期刊文献+

会计稳健性发挥作用么?——来自中国上市公司股权再融资的经验证据 被引量:2

Whether Accounting Conservatism Plays a Role?——Empirical Evidence from SEO of Chinese listed Companies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文研究会计稳健性及信息不对称对股权再融资公告效应的影响,采用应计计量法和内生收益率波动分别衡量会计稳健性和信息不对称。研究结果表明,会计稳健性与再融资公告后累计超额收益率在5%水平上显著正相关,即会计稳健性水平越高,则SEO负效应的程度越小;同时发现信息不对称与SEOCAR之间在10%水平上存在显著负相关关系,但并未发现会计稳健性对于减弱信息不对称给再融资公告效应带来的影响发挥作用。 This paper researches on the influence of accounting conservatism and asymmetric information on SEO announcement effect by accrual measurement method and respectively measuring accounting conservatism and asymmetric information by the internal rate of return volatility. The results show that accounting conservatism and the SEOCAR has significant positive correlation on cumulative ab?normal return at 5% level,i.e. the higher the accounting conservatism level is, the less the negative effect is. Meanwhile the paper finds significant negative correlation between information asymmetry and SEOCAR at 10% level, but the accounting conservatism can't play a role in weakening asymmetric information.
作者 毕金玲
出处 《重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版)》 2015年第2期35-42,共8页 Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University:Social Science Edition
基金 辽宁经济社会发展立项课题(2014lslktziyyjj-16) 东北财经大学青年科研人才培育项目(DUFE2014Q24)
关键词 上市公司 股权再融资 公告效应 会计稳健性 信息不对称 listed companies,SEO announcement effect accounting conservatism asymmetric information
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Ahmed A S, B Billings, R Morton, M Stanford. 2002. Therole of accounting conservatism in mitigating bondholder-shareholder conflicts over dividend policy and in reducingdebt costs[J]. The Accounting Review,77: 867-890. 被引量:1
  • 2Asquith P, D W Mullins. 1986. Equity issues and offeringdilution[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,15: 61-89. 被引量:1
  • 3Ball R, L Shivakumar. 2005. Earnings quality in UKprivate firms: Comparative loss recognition timeliness[J].Journal of Accounting and Economics,39: 83-128. 被引量:1
  • 4Barclay, Michael J, Holderness, Clifford G, Sheehan,Dennis P. 2001. Block Pricing Puzzle[R]. Simon School ofBusiness, working Paper. 被引量:1
  • 5Basu S. 1997. The Conservatism Principle and the Asym-metric Timeliness of Earnings[J]. Journal of Accountingand Economics,24:3~38. 被引量:1
  • 6Bliss J H. Management through Accounts [M]. New York,NY: The Ronald Press Co., 1924. 被引量:1
  • 7Boehme R D, B R Danielsen, S M Sorescu. 2006. Shortsale constraints, differences of opinion, and overvaluation[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 41:455-487. 被引量:1
  • 8Booth J R, Smith R. 1986. Capital Raising, Underwritingand the Certification Hypothesis[J]. Journal of FinancialEconomics, 15: 261-281. 被引量:1
  • 9Dybvig P, J F Zender. 1991. Capital structure and dividendirrelevance with asymmetric information[J]. Review of Fi-nancial Studies(4): 201-220. 被引量:1
  • 10Eckbo B E, Masulis R W. 1992. Adverse selection andthe rights offer paradox [J]. Journal of financialeconomics, 32: 293-332. 被引量:1

二级参考文献162

共引文献234

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部