期刊文献+

我国证券法的域外效力研究 被引量:22

The Extraterritorial Application of Securities Laws
原文传递
导出
摘要 证券市场的国际化使得一国证券法适用于境外发生的某些证券行为成为必要。中国致力于打造国际金融中心,建立证券市场的国际板,有必要赋予其证券法以适度的域外效力。美国证券法半个多世纪以来的实践值得研究和借鉴,特别是2010年的Morrison案判决,颠覆了此前的行为标准和结果标准,而代之以交易标准。鉴于中国目前正在修订《证券法》,建议其中增设关于域外效力的有关条款。其具体设计可保留现行的无域外效力推定,以行为地点作为判别管辖权的原则,同时辅以结果标准,允许中国法院对某些发生于境外但对境内有直接影响的证券行为进行管辖。同时,中国证券法应允许法院以非方便管辖原则为由驳回某些起诉。而从长远看,中国应积极推动制定证券跨国诉讼的多边国际公约,以根本解决管辖权冲突。 The internationalization of the securities market entails the extraterritorial application of securities laws with regard to some acts outside its jurisdiction. China is actually establishing the international financial center and its international board,which renders it necessary to confer its securities laws of extraterritorial application. For such purpose,it is worthy of mentioning the American experience,especially the Morrison decision which overturned the longstanding Conduct Test and Effect Test,and replaced them by a new Transactional Test. Chinese securities laws can retain the actual presumption against extraterritorial application and resort to test of the location of the transaction,and keep the effect test as the supplementary method which makes possible to have jurisdiction on some acts outside of China. Furthermore,the Chinese securities laws may add the forum non conveniens principle to give the courts the latitude to dismiss certain suits. I the long run,China should push forward the elaboration of multilateral convention on the jurisdiction of international securities litigation to resolve the jurisdiction conflicts.
作者 石佳友
出处 《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期129-137,共9页 Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金 中国人民大学民商事法律科学研究中心项目(14MSFJD820001)
关键词 域外管辖 行为标准 结果标准 交易标准 非方便管辖 extraterritorial jurisdiction conduct test effect test transactional test forum non conveniens
  • 相关文献

参考文献42

  • 1Jennifer A. Zerk. Extraterritorial Jurisdiction : Lessons for the Business and Human Rights Sphere from Six Regulatory Areas (M~. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 2010. 被引量:1
  • 2Jean Combacau & Serge Sur. Droit international public [M]. Paris: Montchrestien, 2004. 被引量:1
  • 3Mark Janis. An introduction to international law[M]. Boston: Litde Brown § Company, 1988. 被引量:1
  • 4David Harris. Cases and materials on international law(7th Revised edition)[M] London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2010. 被引量:1
  • 5Andrew N VoUmer & John Byron Sandage. Wood Pulp Case, The Casenote[J].The International Lawyer, 1989, (23) : 721-725. 被引量:1
  • 6Piet Jan Slot & Angus Johnston. An introduction to competition law [M]. Oregon: Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, 2006. 被引量:1
  • 7Dan E. Stigal. International law and limitation on the exercise of extraterritorial jurisdiction in U.S. domestic law[J].Hastings International & Comparative Law Review, 2012, (2) : 323 -382. 被引量:1
  • 8Teemu Ruskola. Colonialism without colonies: on the extraterritorial jurisprudence of the U. S. court[J]. Law And Contempora- ry Problems, 2008, (71) : 217 -242. 被引量:1
  • 9孙南申.跨国证券投资法律适用规则与发展[J].社会科学,2011(12):101-110. 被引量:7
  • 10Jean Salmon (ed.). Dictionnaire de droit international public[M]. Bruxelles: Bruylant/Agence universitaire de la Franco- phonie, 2001. 被引量:1

二级参考文献86

共引文献43

同被引文献238

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部