期刊文献+

DRGs在儿童热液烫伤异常费用管理中的应用 被引量:3

Diagnosis Related Groups Method Used in Abnormal Cost of Pediatric Hot Liquid Scald Inpatients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过对儿童热液烫伤患者DRGs分组,筛选出异常费用病例,分析其成因,提出控制不合理费用的对策。方法采用卡方自动交互监测(CHAID)对1 290例病例进行DRGs分组,制定出各组患者费用合理区间,计算各组线外患者和线外患者比例,分析其产生原因。结果以烧伤面积、治疗结果、是否输血、是否休克作为分类节点将病例分为6个DRGs组合。线外患者比例和线外费用比例分别为6.20%和8.39%。不合理费用产生原因主要是不落实医疗规范和患儿家属缺乏相关知识。结论 DRGs分组可以排除疾病严重程度、病情复杂性对医疗资源消耗的影响,利于查找合理费用区间以外的患者,有针对性地进行费用和质量控制。 Objective To find out the expenses cases by diagnosis related groups method in pediatric hot liquid scald inpatients. Analyze its causes,and put forward the management to control the unreasonable costs.Methods Selecting a burn center of military tertiary hospital as the research object. 1290 medical record data are divided into groups by Chi- Square Automatic Interaction Detection CHAID methods. Make costs reasonable interval,and take the patients of outline in each group. Then analyze its causes. Results 6 DRGs groups were formed by Burns,treatment outcome,blood transfusion and shock. The proportion of off- line patients and the proportion of off- line costs were 6. 20% and 8. 39%. The main reason of unreasonable cost were medical abnormal and no information of children parents. Conclusion The method can reflect influence about the severity and complexity of the disease for medical resource consumption. And it can find out the cases who have extra expenses. The method can be targeted for expenses cost and medical quality control.
出处 《解放军医院管理杂志》 2014年第7期644-646,共3页 Hospital Administration Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army
关键词 诊断相关组 儿童烫伤 烧伤 质量控制 diagnosis related group pediatric scald burn quality control
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献46

  • 1郭富威,任苒.DRGs在美国的发展及在我国的应用对策[J].中国医院管理,2006,26(2):32-35. 被引量:76
  • 2付婷辉,张修梅.北京地区剖宫产类似DRG分组研究[J].中华医院管理杂志,2006,22(3):158-161. 被引量:23
  • 3Adams TP. Case mix index: nursing's new management tool [J].Nurs Manage, 1996, 27(9): 31-32. 被引量:1
  • 4Palmer D. Case-mix indexes: do they adversely affect some hos- pitals[J]. Healthe Financ Manage, 1985, 39(7): 38-42. 被引量:1
  • 5Rosko MD. Estimating hospital inefficiency: does case mix matter[J].J Med Syst,1999, 23(1): 57-71. 被引量:1
  • 6Burik D, Nackel JG. Diagnosis-related groups:tool for manage- ment[J]. Hosp Health Serv Adm, 1981, 26(1): 25-40. 被引量:1
  • 7Francis H,Roger France. Case mix use in 25 countries: a mi- gration success but international comparisons failure[J]. Inter- national Journal of Medical Informatics, 2003, 70: 215-219. 被引量:1
  • 8Barbara OW, Molly S. Evaluation of severity-adjusted DRG sys- tems: addendum to the interim repord-EB/OL3. [2010-05-17]. ht- tps://www. cms gov/reports/downloads/WR434Z1, pdf. 被引量:1
  • 9Palmer G, Reid B, Aisbett C, et al. Evaluating the performance of the Australian National Diagnosis Related Groups[R]. Syd- ney: The Centre for Hospital Management and Information Systems Research, University of New South Wales, 1997. 被引量:1
  • 10Beth R, Stephen S. Comparing diagnosis-related group systems to i- dentify design improvements[J]. Health Policy, 2008, 87: 82-91. 被引量:1

共引文献118

同被引文献32

引证文献3

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部