摘要
在清华简整理者所作宣传中,简文《尹诰》(即《咸有一德》)和《说命》可以"证伪"古文《尚书》是一个重要宣传焦点。文章在此前学者相关研究的基础上正面考察清华简《咸有一德》和《说命》的真伪问题,并考察李学勤先生和廖名春先生对简文的整理研究(在学理方面)是否成立。《尚书》文章有其特定的法度、格调。选择伪造《尚书》文章,这本身就是一个殊不自量的妄举。其捉襟见肘、漏洞百出在所难免。本文结论:(1)清华简《咸有一德》和《说命》内容中的作伪破绽十分明显,其文章质量非常低劣,可以被确认为今人赝作。(2)在李学勤先生和廖名春先生对漏洞百出的简文所作整理研究中,存在许多不应有的失察、失误。在本文的结语部分,考察劣质(指文章质量)伪简及其整理结论(认假作真)正在给中国学术造成什么样的恶性影响,以及结束此事的必要性及其途径。
This paper studies the authenticity of ＂Xian You Yi De＂ and＂ Shuo Ming＂ in tsinghua Jian and draw the conclusion： 1 ,in tsinghua Jian＂ Xian You Yi De＂ and＂ Shuo Ming＂, there exists the fake in the content which the flaw is very clear, its quality also very poor. So it can be considered today∽ fake. 2, in the studies of Mr Li Xue -qin and Mr Liao Mingchun＇s , there are many should -not -have oversight and failures. As Pointing out in the conclusion part of this paper, the investigation of the inferior quality and its inferior finishing conclusions recognized as true to them, are vicious impact to the Chinese academia, as well as the necessity way to end it.
出处
《山东青年政治学院学报》
2015年第1期119-137,共19页
Journal of Shandong Youth University of Political Science
关键词
清华简
咸有一德
说命
伪造
赝品
tsinghua Jian
Xian You Yi De
shuo ruing
fake
contemporary a bully
