摘要
在确定专利犯罪时,不仅要考虑刑法必要性原则,还要兼顾专利权本身的特殊性。刑法必要性原则要求专利犯罪应以严重危害公共利益的行为为基本规制对象,专利权在取得和行使上的特殊性不但进一步佐证了规定假冒专利罪、从事专利管理工作的国家工作人员渎职犯罪、违规申请专利泄露国家秘密犯罪的必要性,而且要求对欺诈取得专利权行为也应规定为犯罪行为。专利权效力与保护范围上的不确定性以及专利制度内在构造的特殊性均表明不应将专利侵权行为犯罪化。虽然我国专利犯罪已基本确定,但《专利法》与《刑法》在专利犯罪的规定方面存在惯性脱节。鉴于《专利法》的修订较之《刑法》会更为频繁,因而应以《刑法》为基础对专利犯罪加以整合,以维护立法统一,便利法律适用。
When establishing patent crimes, not only the principle of criminal necessity should be considered, the character of patent right itself should be cared as well. The principle of criminal necessity required that patent crimes should mainly regulate those offences which seriously harm public interest, and that the distinction of patent right acquiring and enforcing not only further justified the necessity of the crime of palm off, the crimes of malfeasance offended by state organ crews who engaged in patent administration, the crimes of revealing state secret caused by violating provisions for patent application, but also illustrate the need of treating acquire patent right in fraudulence as criminal offence. Uncertainty of validation and the range of protection of patent right, the individualism of internal constitution in patent system beth demonstrate penal code should not embrace act of patent infringement. Although patent crimes needed have been nearly fixed, there exist some inertial lacuna between the provisions in patent law and criminal law as to patent criminal offenses. In the light of the amending of patent law would be more frequent than criminal law, so to maintain coordination between the said two acts and to facilitate judicial practices, we should integrate patent crimes based on the criminal law.
出处
《广西政法管理干部学院学报》
2015年第1期53-60,共8页
Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
关键词
专利犯罪
立法原则
欺诈
专利侵权
整合
Patent Crimes
Lawmaking Principles
Fraudulence
Patent Infringement
Integration
