摘要
目的：对比研究动力髋螺钉（DHS）和防旋股骨近端髓内钉（PFNA）固定治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折疗效。方法抽取我院骨科2010年1月～2014年1月收治老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者204例，按照治疗方法分为DSH组和PFNA组，每组102例。对比两组骨折愈合时间及患肢髋关节功能等指标。结果 DHS组与PFNA组骨性愈合时间无统计学意义；DHS组髋关节功能优良89例（87.25%），PFNA组髋关节功能优良98例（96.08%），PFNA组髋关节功能优于DHS组，数据差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论采用PFNA固定治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效优于DHS法。
Objective Comparative study of dynamic hip screw （DHS） and the anti-rotation proximal femoral nail （PFNA） intertrochanteric fractures in elderly fixation. Methods Chose 204 cases of elderly patients in January 2010~January 2014 in our hospital for intertrochanteric fracture treatmet, divided into PFNA group and DSH group, 102 cases in each group. Compared fracture healing time, limb hip function and other indicators in two groups. Results DHS group and PFNA group of bone healing time were not statistically significant, In DHS group, 89 cases had good hip function （87.25%）~ In PFNA group, 98 cases had good hip function （96.08%）, PFNA group of hip function was significantly better than the DHS group. The data were statistically significant differences （P〈0.05）. Conclusion Elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures using PFNA fixation significantly is better than the DHS method..
出处
《中国继续医学教育》
2015年第4期102-103,共2页
China Continuing Medical Education
关键词
老年股骨粗隆间骨折
DHS
PFNA
DHS
PFNA
Intertrochanteric fracture in elderly
