期刊文献+

收编文类:中国文学史编写的体例问题——从《剑桥中国文学史》谈起 被引量:1

Incorporating the Literary Genres: The Issue of Stylistic Rules Regarding the Writing and Editing of Chinese Literary Histories: On The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature
下载PDF
导出
摘要 20世纪以来,中国文学史编写经历了由文体导向,转为时代为轴。"文章流别"传统在近代以来"一代有一代文学"的观念下隐匿不现,文体类别被收编在时代为主的文学史中。民国时形成的文学史编写体例在建国后又得到确认和固化,直到《剑桥文学史》出现,又重新引发对文学史体例的新一轮思考。 The writing and editing of Chinese literary histories have since the twentieth century evolved from the orientation by way of literary genres to the axis of times. The tradition of "schools of writing" remains invisible with the modern concept that "each generation has its own literature" with the result that literary genres are included in literary histories focusing on times. The stylistic rules regarding the writing and editing of literary histories in the Republic of China were reconfirmed and solidified after the founding of the People's Republic of China until The Cambridge History" of Chinese Literature was published, which gave rise to a new round of thinking in regard to the stylistic rules about literary histories.
作者 蒋金珅
机构地区 澳门大学中文系
出处 《华文文学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期16-21,共6页 Literatures in Chinese
关键词 《剑桥中国文学史》 体例 文体 时代 The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature, stylistic rules, literary genres, times
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献2

  • 1Stephen Owen and Kang-i Sun Chang. Proposal for the Cambridge History of Chinese Literature [Z]. 2004. 被引量:1
  • 2Marshall Brown. Periods and Resistance[J].Modern Language Quarterly, 2001, Dec. 被引量:1

共引文献83

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部