期刊文献+

视频辅助腹膜后清创术治疗重症急性胰腺炎继发感染 被引量:7

Video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement for the treatment of infected necrotizing pancreatitis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨视频辅助腹膜后清创(video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement,VARD)在重症急性胰腺炎继发感染患者炎症控制中的作用。方法回顾性分析首都医科大学宣武医院32例次VARD患者的临床资料,采用配对样本t检验比较治疗前后患者心率、平均动脉压、体温及炎症反应指标(白细胞、C-反应蛋白及降钙素原)的变化。结果经VARD治疗,患者心率(术前比术后8h,108±22次/min比95±177次/min)、平均动脉压(术前比术后12h,664-18mmHg比79±19mmHg)及体温(术前比术后24h,38.3±1.7℃比37.3±1.3℃)状况较前均有好转(均P〈0.05),血白细胞计数[术前比术后48h,(13.84±6.6)×10^9/L比(10.1±5.2)×10^9/L]、C.反应蛋白(术前比术后48h,145±88 mg/L比954±4mg/L)及降钙素原(术前比术后48h,1.44±0.7μg/L比0.9±0.4μg/L)亦明显下降,差异均有统计学意义(均P〈0.05)。结论VARD治疗能显著减轻重症急性胰腺炎继发感染患者的全身炎症反应,改善患者一般状况。 Objective To determine the effect of video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement in treatment of infected neerotizing pancreatitis. Methods The clinical data of patients with infected necrotizing panereatitis was retrospectively analyzed. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, body temperature and indicators for inflammatory response including level of WBC, CRP and procalcitonin before and after VARD treatment were compared. Results After VARD treatment, the heart rate (preoperative vs. postoperative 8 h, 108 ± 22/min vs. 95±17/min), mean arterial pressure (preoperative vs. postoperative 12 h,66 ± 18 mmHg vs. 79 ± 19 mmHg) and body temperature(preoperative vs. postoperative 24 h,38. 3 ± 1.7 ℃ vs. 37. 3 ± 1.3 ℃ ) improved significantly ( all P 〈 O. 05 ). Level of WBC [ preoperative vs. postoperative 48 h, ( 13.8 ±6. 6)× 10^9/L vs. ( 10. 1±5.2) × 10^9/L], CRP(preoperative vs. postoperative 48 h, 145 ± 88 mg/L vs. 95 ± 4 mg/L) and procalcitonin (preoperative vs. postoperative 48 h, 1.4 ± 0.7 p,g/L vs. 0. 9 ± 0.4 μg/L) also decreased significantly( all P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusions VARD therapy can significantly reduce systemic inflammation and improve the general condition of infected necrotizing pancreatitis patients.
出处 《中华普通外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第1期4-6,共3页 Chinese Journal of General Surgery
关键词 胰腺炎 急性坏死性 清创术 外科手术 微创性 Pancreatitis, acute necrotizing Debridement Surgical procedures, minimallyinvasive
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1曹锋,李非.再论重症急性胰腺炎感染及预防性抗生素的合理应用[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2011,23(1):77-79. 被引量:34
  • 2李非.重症急性胰腺炎继发感染的外科处理[J].中国实用外科杂志,2012,32(7):548-551. 被引量:10
  • 3van Santvoort HC,Besselink MG,Bakker OJ,et al.A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis[J].N Engl J Med,2010,362(16):1491-1502. 被引量:1
  • 4Wente MN,Veit JA,Bassi C,et al.Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage(PPH):an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery(ISGPS) definition[J].Surgery,2007,142(1):20-25. 被引量:1
  • 5Bassi C,Dervenis C,Butturini G,et al.Postoperative pancreatic fistula:an international study group(ISGPF) definition[J].Surgery,2005,138(1):8-13. 被引量:1
  • 6李非.腹膜后入路腹腔镜胰腺坏死清除术[J].中华普通外科杂志,2013,28(8):646-646. 被引量:4
  • 7Villazón A,Villazón O,Terrazas F,et al.Retroperitoneal drainage in the management of the septic phase of severe acute pancreatitis[J].World J Surg,1991,15(3):103-107. 被引量:1
  • 8Bucher P,Pugin F,Morel P.Minimally invasive necrosectomy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis[J].Pancreas,2008,36(2):113-119. 被引量:1
  • 9Tu Y,Jiao H,Tan X,et al.Laparotomy versus retroperitoneal laparoscopy in debridement and drainage of retroperitoneal infected necrosis in severe acute pancreatitis[J].Surg Endosc,2013,27(11):4217-4223. 被引量:1
  • 10Besselink MG,van Santvoort HC,Nieuwenhuijs VB,et al.Minimally invasive " step-up approach " versus maximal necrosectomy in patients with acute necrotising pancreatitis(PANTER trial):design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial[ISRCTN13975868][J].BMC Surg,2006,6(1):6. 被引量:1

二级参考文献23

共引文献41

同被引文献38

引证文献7

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部