摘要
我们通过辨析2013年某海外拍卖行拍出的苏轼《功甫帖》、苏轼现存书法及苏轼在湖州留下的书法遗迹,认为:《功甫帖》是用苏轼晚年书法摹写中期书法,字体脱离苏轼特定时期的书风特点;笔墨不精,与苏轼真迹差距甚远;结体呆板,整帖格式不合规矩;墨迹人为搽磨做旧,有摹、填结合加涂改嫌疑,个别笔划非自然书写;印章有作伪嫌疑。因此,现在的《功甫帖》与苏轼同时期的书风格格不入,属于用晚年书风特征仿中年书法,非自然书写,是一个摹填结合再加涂改的仿品。
This paper examines the authenticity of Su Shi’s Gong Fu Tie Calligraphy（which was sold in 2013）through comprising it with Su Shi’s extant calligraphies,including both ones in major museums and ones on memorial stone in Huzhou.According to the comparison,it is obvious that Gong Fu Tie Calligraphy is a forgery,which presents Sushi’s style during his late years,rather than middle age,therefore reveals the discrepancy between style and time.The reasons are as follows：Firstly,its brushwork and using of ink are different from Su Shi’s genuine calligraphy;secondly,the stroke is stiff and dearth of movement;thirdly,its format is unconventional and against the rules;Fourthly,the ink is fabricated to present a worn-out effect;Fifthly,there are marks of tracing,filling,and also altering;Finally,there is forgery of seals.
出处
《湖州职业技术学院学报》
2014年第4期74-77,共4页
Journal of Huzhou Vocational and Technological College
关键词
苏轼
《功甫帖》
辨伪
Su Shi
Gong Fu Tie Calligraphy
connoisseurship.
