期刊文献+

关系冲突管理:团队效能感和团队情绪智力的调节作用 被引量:24

Management of Relationship Conflict:The Moderating Effects of Team Efficacy and Team Emotional Intelligence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 关系冲突是工作团队交互过程中不可避免的现象,这使得关系冲突管理技能显得尤为重要。通过整合社会认知和情绪理论,考察了关系冲突、团队效能感和团队情绪智力对团队绩效的影响机制。基于68个工作团队的调查数据,研究发现,关系冲突会造成团队绩效水平的下降,而团队效能感和团队情绪智力能够显著提升团队绩效水平。团队效能感在关系冲突与团队绩效的关系中扮演了重要的调节角色,即当团队拥有较低的效能感时,关系冲突对团队绩效拥有较强的负面影响;而当团队拥有较高的效能感时,关系冲突对团队绩效的负面影响消失。然而,团队情绪智力对关系冲突和绩效关系的调节作用不显著。 Relationship conflict is one of the inevitable phenomenon of the interactive processes in work teams, meaning that it is important to pay more attention to relationship conflict management. The present study integrates contingency theory, social cognitive theories and emotion theories to examine the effects of relationship conflict, team efficacy and team emotional intelligence on team performance. The results based on 68 teams show that relationship conflict is negatively related to team performance, whereas team efficacy and team emotional intelligence significantly improves team performance. Furthermore, team efficacy plays as an important moderator between relationship conflict and team performance, which means relationship conflict has a strong negative impact on team performance in low efficacy teams and the negative effect disappears in high efficacy teams. However, the moderating effect of team emotional intelligence on the relationship between relationship conflict and performance is not significant.
出处 《系统管理学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期138-145,152,共9页 Journal of Systems & Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71271219 71221061 71071164) 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-11-0519) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金资助项目(14YJC630180) 湖南省研究生科研创新项目(CX2012B106)
关键词 关系冲突 团队效能感 团队情绪智力 团队绩效 调节变量 relationship conflict team efficacy team emotional intelligence team performance moderating variables
  • 相关文献

参考文献52

  • 1Jehn K A. A multirnethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict [J]. Admini- strative Science Quarterly, 1995, 40(2): 256-282. 被引量:1
  • 2de WitF R, Greer L L, Jehn K A. The paradox of intragroup eonflict: A meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2012, 97(2): 360-390. 被引量:1
  • 3Farh J L, Lee C, Farh C I. Task conflict and team creativity: A question of how much and when[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2010, 95(6): 1173-1180. 被引量:1
  • 4陈璐,杨百寅,井润田,王国锋.家长式领导、冲突与高管团队战略决策效果的关系研究[J].南开管理评论,2010,13(5):4-11. 被引量:52
  • 5De Dreu C K, Weingart L R. Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88(4) : 741-749. 被引量:1
  • 6Huang J. Unbundling task conflict and relationship conflict: The moderating role of team goal orientation and conflict management[J]. International Journal of Conflict Management, 2010, 21(3): 334-355. 被引量:1
  • 7Simons T L, Peterson R S. Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams:The pivotal role of intragroup trust[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000, 85(1): 102-111. 被引量:1
  • 8郎淳刚,席酉民,郭士伊.团队内冲突对团队决策质量和满意度影响的实证研究[J].管理评论,2007,19(7):10-15. 被引量:43
  • 9Bodtker A M, Jameson J K. Emotion in conflict formation and its transformation: Application to organizational conflict management[J]. International Journal of Conflict Management, 2001, 12(3): 259- 275. 被引量:1
  • 10Shaw J D, Zhu J, Dully M K, et al. A contingency model of conflict and team effeetiveness[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2011, 96(2)I 391-400. 被引量:1

二级参考文献290

共引文献261

同被引文献334

引证文献24

二级引证文献116

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部