摘要
香港社会在讨论行政长官普选方案时争议最大的焦点问题是特首候选人的提名机制。《香港基本法》第45条及全国人大常委会2007年的决定明确了行政长官普选时候选人由提名委员会提名、提名委员会的产生和组成应当参照选举委员会的现行规定、提名委员会提名应当遵循"民主程序"三个核心要素。香港社会一些人之所以不接受提名委员会,乃在于没有认识到提名委员会提名机制的制度理性。只有回到基本法的规定和全国人大常委会有关决定上来,充分认识提名委员会提名机制的制度理性,珍惜和维护提名委员会的制度共识和制度进步的路径依赖,才是实现行政长官普选的唯一可行之道。
The key issue relating to the nomination of candidates in the selection of the Chief Executive （CE） of HKSAR by universal suffrage has been a spotlight in Hong Kong nowadays. Proclaimed by Article 45 of the Basic Law and the Decision of the NPCSC in 2007 ,the nomination of CE candidates before the universal suffrage shall be proceeded by the nominating committee, the composition and formation method of the nominating committee shall be made with reference to the current provisions regarding the Election Committee, the nomination by the nominating committee shall be implemented in accordance with democratic procedures. It needs to be noted, the reason why a few people in Hong Kong were unfavorable to the institutional arrangement of the nominating committe lies in that they have not yet been aware of the institutional rationality of the nomination by the nominating committee. Predictably, the CE universal suffrage would be achieved in a feasible approach only if： the Basic Law and the NPCSC decisions must be prioritized as the supremacy, especially in the political reform of Hong Kong, the institutional rationality of the nomination by the nominating committee has been sufficiently recognized as well as the ‘path dependence＇ concerning the institutional value of the nominating committee shall be treasured and maintained.
出处
《武汉大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第1期45-53,共9页
Wuhan University Journal：Philosophy & Social Science
基金
国家社科基金一般项目(12BFX035)
深圳市社学社会科学十二五规划课题(123A079)
关键词
基本法
行政长官普选
提名委员会
公民提名
制度理性
Basic Law
universal suffrage for chief executive selection
nominating committee
civil nomination
institutional rationality
