期刊文献+

SYNTAX积分和Gensini评分对急性ST段抬高心肌梗死患者远期心血管事件的预测价值 被引量:19

The predictive value of the SYNTAX score and gensini score for long-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨SYNTAX积分和Gensini评分对急性ST段抬高心肌梗死(STEMI)患者远期预后的预测价值。方法采用回顾性分析,连续入选2008年1月1日至2009年12月31日因STEMI收入北京大学第三医院心脏重症监护室,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)并存活出院的患者共178例,计算SYNTAX积分和Gensini评分,按三分类法将患者分为3组:SYNTAX积分低分组SSlow〈10分(49例)、中分组10分≤SSmid〈18分(69例)、高分组SShigh≥18分(60例);Gensini评分低分组GSlow〈41分(59例)、中分组41分≤GSmid〈64分(65例)、高分组GShigh≥64分(54例)。随访其主要不良心血管事件(major adverse cardiac events,MACE),包括全因死亡、非致命性心肌梗死、再次血运重建、再次因心脏病住院的发生率,平均随访(4.7±0.5)年。结果 SYNTAX积分低分、中分及高分组的MACE发生率分别是18.4%、21.7%和45.0%,组间比较差异有显著统计学意义(P=0.004)。Gensini评分低分、中分及高分组的MACE发生率分别是20.3%、33.8%和33.3%,组间比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.186)。Cox多因素分析显示,SYNTAX积分是术后5年发生MACE的独立预测因子(P=0.037),以高分组为参照,中分组发生MACE的风险显著降低(HR 0.42,95%CI 0.21~0.84,P=0.015);而Gensini评分对远期预后无预测价值。结论 SYNTAX积分是STEMI患者远期发生MACE的独立预测因子,而Gensini评分对STEMI患者远期MACE发生率无预测价值。 Objective To investigate the predictive value of the SYNTAX score and Gensini score for long-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Methods Retrospectively analyzed consecutive series of patients diagnosed with acute STEMI and treated with PCI who enrolled in Peking University Third Hospital Cardiac Intensive Care Unit from January 2008 to December2009,and survived to hospital discharge. The study enrolled 178 cases,and calculate the SYNTAX score and Gensini score. Tertiles for SYNTAX score and Gensini score were defined SSlow〈 10( n = 49),10≤SSmid〈 18( n = 69),SShigh≥18( n = 60),GSlow〈 41( n = 59),41 ≤ GSmid〈 64( n = 65),GShigh≥64( n = 54),respectively. The average follow-up time was 4. 7 ± 0. 5 years. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events( MACE), including all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization,and hospitalization due to heart disease. Results The rate of MACE in SYNTAX score groups was 18. 4% in the low,21. 7% in the intermedian,,45. 0% in the high( P = 0. 004). The rate of MACE in Gensini score groups was 20. 3% in the low,33. 8% in the intermedian,33. 3% in the high( P =0. 186). The rate of MACE in the intermedian is higher than in the high. Multivariate COX regression analysis demonstrated that the SYNTAX score independently predicted the rate of 5-year MACE in patients with STEMI( P = 0. 037). After adjusting SShighlevel as a reference point,MACE was found significant for SSmid( HR 0. 42,95% CI 0. 21-0. 84,P = 0. 015). And the Gensini score had no predictive value for 5-year MACE. Conclusions The SYNTAX score was an independent risk factor for long-term impact on MACE in patients with STEMI,but the Gensini score had no ability of predicting long-term clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI.
出处 《中国介入心脏病学杂志》 2014年第12期755-760,共6页 Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology
基金 国家自然科学基金(81300076)
关键词 急性ST段抬高心肌梗死 SYNTAX积分 GENSINI评分 主要不良心血管事件 Acute myocardial infarction SYNTAX score Gensini score Major adverse cardiac events
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Serryus PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N EnglJ Med, 2009,360: 961- 972. 被引量:1
  • 2Garg S,Sarno G, Girasis C, et al. A patient-level pooled analysis assessing the impact of the SYNTAX (synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery) score on I-year clinical outcomes in 6, 508 patients enrolled in contemporary coronary stent trials.JACC Cardiovasc Interv ,2011,4 :645-653. 被引量:1
  • 3Sinning C, Lillpopp L, Appelbaum S, et al. Angiographic score assessment improves cardiovascular risk prediction: the clinical value of SYNTAX and Gensini application. Clin Res Cardiol, 2013,102 :495-503. 被引量:1
  • 4孟浩宇,张敏,陈彭生,卢鑫,赵正宏,毛雨,杨志健.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术对无保护左主干病变患者的疗效和预后对比分析及Syntax积分的价值[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2013,21(4):205-211. 被引量:16
  • 5Gensini GG. A more meaningful scoring system for determining the severity of coronary heart disease. AmJ Cardiol, 1983 ,51 : 606. 被引量:1
  • 6Park KW, KangJ, Kang SH, et al. Usefulness of the SYNTAX and clinical SYNTAX scores in predicting clinical outcome after unrestricted use of sirolimus- and everolimus-eluting Stents. CircJ, 2013,77 :2912-2921. 被引量:1
  • 7Biondi-Zoccai G, Lotrionte M, Sheiban I. Management of multi vessel coronary disease after ST -elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary coronary angioplasty. Am HeartJ, 2010,160: S28-S35. 被引量:1
  • 8Farooq V, Vergouwe Y, Raber L, et al. Combined anatomical and clinical factors for the long-term risk stratification of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the logistic clinical SYNTAX score. Eur HeartJ, 2012,33 :3098-3104. 被引量:1
  • 9Fu Z, Xue H, Dong W, et al. Correlation between Comprehensive Evaluation of Coronary Artery Lesion Severity and Long-term Clinical Outcomes in Chinese Octogenarians with Acute Coronary Syndrome. Heart Lung Circ, 2014,23:1125-1131. 被引量:1
  • 10HerlitzJ , Dellborg M, Karlson BW, et al. Prognosis after acute myocardial infarction continues to improve in the reperfusion era in the community of Goteborg. Am HeartJ, 2002, 144 : 89 -94. 被引量:1

二级参考文献17

  • 1Chikwe J, Kim M, Goldstone AB, et al. Current diagnosis and management of left main coronary disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2010,38 : 420-428. 被引量:1
  • 2Garg S, Stone GW, Kappetein AP, et al. Clinical and angiographic risk assessment in patients with left main stem lesions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2010,3: 891-901. 被引量:1
  • 3Anderson HV, Shaw RE, Brindis RG, et al. Risk-adjusted mortality analysis of percutaneous coronary interventions by American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommendations. Am J Cardiol,2007,99: 189-196. 被引量:1
  • 4KimYH,Park DW, Kim WJ, et al. Impact of the extent of coronary artery disease on outcomes after revascularization for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2010,55 : 2544-2552. 被引量:1
  • 5Park DW,Kim YH, Song HG, et al. Long-term comparison of drug-eluting stents and coronary artery bypass grafting for muhivessel coronary revascularization: 5-year outcomes from the Asan Medical Center-Multivessel Revascularization Registry. J Am Coil Cardiol,2011, 57: 128-137. 被引量:1
  • 6Kushner FG, Hand M, Smith SC Jr, et al. 2009 Focused Updates: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (updating the 2004 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update ) and ACC/AHA/SCAI Guidelines on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (updating the 2005 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update ): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation, 2009,120 : 2271-2306. 被引量:1
  • 7Kolh P,Sousa Uva M, Wijns W. The new 2011 ACCF/AHA Guidelines on Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting surgery: are they different from the 2010 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularisation? EuroIntervention,2012,8 : 33-34. 被引量:1
  • 8Taggart DP, Boyle R, de Belder MA, et al. The 2010 ESC/ EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularisation. Heart,2011, 97 : 445-446. 被引量:1
  • 9Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med,2009,360: 961- 972. 被引量:1
  • 10Mohr FW, Rastan A J, Serruys P W, et al. Complex coronary anatomy in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: impact of complex coronary anatomy in modern bypass surgery? Lessons learned from the SYNTAX trial after two years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2011,141 : 130-140. 被引量:1

共引文献15

同被引文献404

引证文献19

二级引证文献117

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部