摘要
目的:探讨临床量表在老年非高危急性肺栓塞诊断中的预测价值。方法:根据2008年欧洲新版急性肺栓塞诊疗流程指南,连续收集在急诊诊治的268例可疑老年非高危肺栓塞患者的临床资料,分别进行Wells量表、Geneva量表和修正Geneva量表评估,并与最终确诊结果进行比较。结果:268例可疑老年非高危肺栓塞患者中,确诊为非高危肺栓塞78例;Wells量表、Geneva量表和修正Geneva量表高可能性组的阳性预测值分别为48.57%(34/70)、45.21%(33/73)和46.05%(35/76),低可能性组的阴性预测值分别为87.96%(95/108)、86.41%(89/103)和90.91%(100/110)。诊断肺栓塞的阳性似然比、阴性似然比、Youden指数和一致性系数Wells量表分别为2.30、0.70、0.24和0.254,Geneva量表分别为2.01、0.73、0.21和0.217,修正Geneva量表分别为2.08、0.703、0.23和0.235。3种量表对肺栓塞诊断的敏感度、特异度比较差异无统计学意义。结论:3种临床量表在非高危急性肺栓塞筛查中具有一定的预测价值,且预测效率差异无统计学意义。
Objective:To evaluate diagnostic value of three clinical scores in elderly patients with acute non-high- risk pulmonary embolism ( PE ). Methods: Wells, Geneva and Revised- Geneva scores were performed in 268 elderly patients suspected non- high- risk PE admitted to emergency, according to the latest guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Results:Seventy-eight patients with non-high-risk PE were diagnosed with lung imaging as gold standard. Respectively, positive predictive values for high clinical probability of Wells score, Geneva score and Revised- Geneva score were 48.57% ( 34/70 ), 45.21% ( 33/73 ) and 46. 05% ( 35/76 ) negative predictive values for low clinical probability of Wells score, Geneva score and Revised-Geneva score were 87.96% (95/108), 86.41% (89/103) and 90.91% (100/110). Positive and negative likelihood ratios, Youden index and crude agreement of Wells scorle were 2. 30, 0. 73, 0. 21 and 0. 217; and Revised-Geneva score were to three scores, the sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis 0. 70, 0. 24 and 0. 254 ; and Geneva score were 2. 01, 2. 08, 0. 703, 0. 23and 0. 235 ; respectively. Compared for PE was no statistical significance. Conclusions: In the screening of non high risk acute pulmonary embolism, clinical scores have some predictive value. The comparison of prediction efficiericy of three clinical scores don't have a significant statistically difference.
出处
《现代医学》
2014年第12期1383-1386,共4页
Modern Medical Journal
基金
江苏省卫生厅"科教兴卫"重点实验室开放课题(KF 200949)
关键词
急性肺栓塞
非高危
临床量表
老年
pulmonary embolism
non- high- risk
clinical scores
elderly