期刊文献+

三种临床量表在老年非高危急性肺栓塞诊断中的应用价值 被引量:3

Evaluation of three clinical scores in diagnosis of acute non-high-risk pulmonary embolism in elderly patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨临床量表在老年非高危急性肺栓塞诊断中的预测价值。方法:根据2008年欧洲新版急性肺栓塞诊疗流程指南,连续收集在急诊诊治的268例可疑老年非高危肺栓塞患者的临床资料,分别进行Wells量表、Geneva量表和修正Geneva量表评估,并与最终确诊结果进行比较。结果:268例可疑老年非高危肺栓塞患者中,确诊为非高危肺栓塞78例;Wells量表、Geneva量表和修正Geneva量表高可能性组的阳性预测值分别为48.57%(34/70)、45.21%(33/73)和46.05%(35/76),低可能性组的阴性预测值分别为87.96%(95/108)、86.41%(89/103)和90.91%(100/110)。诊断肺栓塞的阳性似然比、阴性似然比、Youden指数和一致性系数Wells量表分别为2.30、0.70、0.24和0.254,Geneva量表分别为2.01、0.73、0.21和0.217,修正Geneva量表分别为2.08、0.703、0.23和0.235。3种量表对肺栓塞诊断的敏感度、特异度比较差异无统计学意义。结论:3种临床量表在非高危急性肺栓塞筛查中具有一定的预测价值,且预测效率差异无统计学意义。 Objective:To evaluate diagnostic value of three clinical scores in elderly patients with acute non-high- risk pulmonary embolism ( PE ). Methods: Wells, Geneva and Revised- Geneva scores were performed in 268 elderly patients suspected non- high- risk PE admitted to emergency, according to the latest guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Results:Seventy-eight patients with non-high-risk PE were diagnosed with lung imaging as gold standard. Respectively, positive predictive values for high clinical probability of Wells score, Geneva score and Revised- Geneva score were 48.57% ( 34/70 ), 45.21% ( 33/73 ) and 46. 05% ( 35/76 ) negative predictive values for low clinical probability of Wells score, Geneva score and Revised-Geneva score were 87.96% (95/108), 86.41% (89/103) and 90.91% (100/110). Positive and negative likelihood ratios, Youden index and crude agreement of Wells scorle were 2. 30, 0. 73, 0. 21 and 0. 217; and Revised-Geneva score were to three scores, the sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis 0. 70, 0. 24 and 0. 254 ; and Geneva score were 2. 01, 2. 08, 0. 703, 0. 23and 0. 235 ; respectively. Compared for PE was no statistical significance. Conclusions: In the screening of non high risk acute pulmonary embolism, clinical scores have some predictive value. The comparison of prediction efficiericy of three clinical scores don't have a significant statistically difference.
出处 《现代医学》 2014年第12期1383-1386,共4页 Modern Medical Journal
基金 江苏省卫生厅"科教兴卫"重点实验室开放课题(KF 200949)
关键词 急性肺栓塞 非高危 临床量表 老年 pulmonary embolism non- high- risk clinical scores elderly
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1HUISMAN M V, KLOK F A. How I diagnose acute pulmonary embolism[J]. Blood,2013,121 (22) :4443-4448. 被引量:1
  • 2TORBICKI A L, PERRIER A, KONSTANTINIDES S, et al. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism:the task force for the diagnosis and management of a- cute pulmonary embolism of the european society of cardiology (ESC) [J]. Eur Heart J,2008,29(18) :2276-2315. 被引量:1
  • 3吴伟程,蔺际龚,杨成彬,吴郁珍,俞祥玫,刘加权,张自立.Wells与修正Geneva评分急诊筛肺栓塞的比较查[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2012,21(3):282-285. 被引量:15
  • 4KONSTANTINIDES S, GOLDHABER S Z. Pulmonary embol- ism: risk assessment and management [ J ]. Eur Heart J, 2012, 33(24) :3014-3022. 被引量:1
  • 5周卫华,徐晓龑.老年肺栓塞40例临床分析[J].实用老年医学,2012,26(4):309-311. 被引量:4
  • 6PIERRE-JUSTIN G, PIERARD L A. Management of mobile right heart thrombi: a prospective series [ J ]. Int J Cardiol, 2005,99(3) :381-388. 被引量:1
  • 7LE G G, RIGHINI M, ROY P M, et al. Prediction of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: the revised Geneva score [ J ]. Ann Intern Med,2006,144 (3) : 165-171. 被引量:1
  • 8CERIANI E, COMBESCURE C, LEG G, et al. Clinical predic- tion rules for pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta- analysis[ J ]. J Thromb Haemost ,2010,8 ( 5 ) :957-970. 被引量:1
  • 9闻立新,杨远.肺栓塞中肌红蛋白临床意义的研究进展[J].现代医学,2011,39(3):384-386. 被引量:5

二级参考文献41

共引文献21

同被引文献21

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部