摘要
本文从建设性后现代法学视域探讨正义问题,认为正义作为公认价值概念和理想目标是客观存在的,但正义在每一社会历史阶段的实现都是具体的,因此,应当从过程性和关系性视域来分析和评价各种正义论观点,既吸收其合理思想内核,也揭示和抛弃其错误观点。从过程哲学价值论视角看,正义是法的一种价值表现。我们必须联系与具体案件、具体法律问题相关联的法律事实,并结合其在整个社会发展过程中与其他社会事实和过程的联系来具体地分析正义。否则就会陷入"误置具体性之谬误"。在裁判疑难案件时,正义的要求除了必须考虑所有既定法律和案例以外,更主要要考虑判决做出后可能产生的实际效果及对未来社会进程可能产生的影响,最终要以是否能达到预期的良好社会秩序和推动社会进步衡量个案的裁判是否正义。
This paper deals with the problem of justice from the perspective of constructive postmodernist jurisprudence, and insists that justice as a universal value conception and ideal aim is a objective being, but the realization of justice in each stage of social history is concrete and historical, so we should analyze and comment the various viewpoints of justice, absorbing its reasonable core of thought and revealing and abandoning its wrong viewpoints. From the perspective of the doctrine of values of process philosophy, justice is a kind of value expression. So we have to analyze concretely justice according its relation to specific cases, specific legal problems, and considering its relation to other social facts and processes in the whole social development. Or else we will probable to be caught in ＂the fallacy of misplaced concreteness＂. In the judgment of hard cases, the justice requires mainly the practical effect of the decision as well as the given law and cases, fi nally that the specifi c decision is justice or not, is dependent on it has a good social effect and in some sense a promotion to the development of society.
出处
《北京政法职业学院学报》
2014年第4期1-7,共7页
Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
关键词
建设性后现代法学
正义
过程性
关系性
社会效果
constructive postmodernist jurisprudence
justice
process
relationship
social effect
