期刊文献+

南亚热带3种阔叶树种人工幼龄纯林及其混交林碳贮量比较 被引量:24

Comparison of carbon storage in juvenile monoculture and mixed plantation stands of three common broadleaved tree species in subtropical China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 如何通过优化造林模式来提高人工林生态系统碳贮量已受到广泛关注。以南亚热带8年生格木(Erythrophleum fordii)纯林(PE)、红锥(Castanopsis hystrix)纯林(PC)、米老排(Mytilaria laosensis)纯林(PM)及格木×红锥×米老排混交林(MECM)生态系统为研究对象,对其碳贮量及其分配特征进行了比较研究。结果表明:格木、红锥和米老排不同器官平均碳含量分别为512.4—561.7 g/kg,474.2—553.4 g/kg和512.8—556.3 g/kg。相同树种不同器官之间碳含量差异显著(P<0.05)。各器官碳含量的平均值大小顺序为格木(539.3 g/kg)>米老排(532.7 g/kg)>红锥(515.3 g/kg)。不同林分间,灌木层、草本层和凋落物层碳含量均以米老排纯林最高,混交林(MECM)居次,红锥纯林和格木纯林最低;不同林分之间的土壤碳含量差异显著(P<0.05),0—10cm,10—30cm,30—50cm和50—100cm土壤碳含量均以米老排纯林最高,红锥纯林居次,格木纯林和混交林(MECM)土壤碳含量最低。生态系统碳贮量大小顺序为米老排(308.0 t/hm2)>混交林(182.8 t/hm2)>红锥纯林(180.2 t/hm2)>格木纯林(135.2 t/hm2),相同组分不同林分间以及相同林分的不同组分间均存在显著差异(P<0.05),但混交林与红锥纯林间碳贮量总量无显著差异(P>0.05)。造林模式对人工林碳贮量及其分配有显著影响,营建混交林有利于红锥和格木地上碳的累积,不利于土壤碳的固定,而营建纯林既有利于米老排生物量碳的吸收,也有利于土壤碳的固定。因而,对碳汇林造林模式的选择,应根据树种固碳特性而定。 Enhancement of the carbon storage of plantation ecosystems by optimizing afforestation patterns has been extensively researched. In the present study, we investigated carbon storage and allocation in an 8-year-old Erythrophleum fordii stand (PE), a Castanopsis hystrix stand (PC), a Mytilaria laosensis stand (PM), and a mixed E. fordii C. hystrix M. laosensis stand (MECM) in subtropical China. We showed that the average carbon contents of different organs in E. fordii, C. hystrix, and M. laosensis ranged from 509.0 g/kg to 572.4 g/kg, 474.2 g/kg to 553.4 g/kg, and 512.8 g/kg to 556.3 g/kg, respectively. We determined significant differences in carbon contents among different organs of the same tree species. Within the same organs, the average carbon contents of different stands were ranked as follows: E. fordii (539.3 g/kg) 〉 M. laosensis (532.7 g/kg) 〉 C. hystrix (515.3 g/kg). In the shrub, herb, and litter layers, the highest carbon contents among the four stands occurred in PM, followed by MECM, PC, and PE. The carbon contents of the 0-10 cm, 10-30 cm, 30-50 cm, and 50-100 cm soil layers differed significantly among the four stands and were the highest in PM, followed by PC, MECM, and PE. The ecosystem carbon storages were ranked as PM (308.0 t/hm2) 〉 MECM (182.8 t/hm2) 〉 PC (180.2 t/hm2) 〉 PE (135.2 t/hm2). We determined significant differences in average carbon contents within and among stands (P 〈 0.05), but no significant differences in the total ecosystem carbon storage between MECM and PE (P 〉 0.05). Our results indicate that the mode of afforestation can markedly influence the carbon storage and allocation of plantations. In mixed stands, C. hystrix and E. fordii will benefit from an increase in aboveground biomass carbon, but not from accumulation of soil carbon. On the other hand, in monoculture, M. laosensis will benefit from the sequestration of aboveground biomass carbon and from accumulation of soil carbon. Therefore, the afforesta
出处 《生态学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第1期180-188,共9页 Acta Ecologica Sinica
基金 国家"十二五"农村领域科技计划项目(2012BAD22B0105) 中国林科院中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务专项资金项目(CAFYBB2014QA033) 广西自然科学基金青年基金项目(2014jj BA30073) 中国林业科学研究院热带林业实验中心主任基金项目(RL2011-02)资助
关键词 格木 红锥 米老排 人工幼林 造林模式 碳贮量 Erythrophleum fordii Castanopsis hystrix Mytilaria laosensis young plantations afforestation mode carbon storage
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Pope J. How can global warming be traced to CO2. Scientific America, 2006, 295(6) : 124-124. 被引量:1
  • 2Fang J Y, Chen A P, Peng C H, Zhao S Q, Ci L J. Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998. Science, 2001, 292(5525) : 2320-2322. 被引量:1
  • 3Caldeira K, Duffy P B. The role of the southern ocean in up take and storage of anthropogenic carbon dioxide. Science, 2000, 287 (5453): 620- 622. 被引量:1
  • 4Norby R J, Luo Y Q. Evaluating ecosystem responses to rising atmospheric CO2 and global warming in a multi-factor world. New Phytologist, 2006, 162(2) : 281-293. 被引量:1
  • 5Brown S. Present and potential roles of forests in the global climate change debate. Unasylva, 1996, 47(185) : 3-10. 被引量:1
  • 6Lun F, Li W H, Liu Y. Complete forest carbon cycle and budget in China 1999--2008. Forest Ecology and Management, 2012, 264: 81-89. 被引量:1
  • 7Hoover C M, Leak W B, Keel B G. Benchmark carbon stocks from old-growth forests in northern New England, USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 2012, 266: 108- 114. 被引量:1
  • 8Pan Y D, Birdsey R A, Fang J Y, Houghton R, Kauppi P E, Kurz W A, Phillips O L, Shvidenko A, Lewis S L, CanadcU J G, Ciais P, Jackson R B, Pacala S W, McGuire A D, Piao S L, Rantiainen A, Sitch S, Hayes D. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world's forests. Science, 2011, 333(6045): 988-993. 被引量:1
  • 9Woodwell G M, Whittaker R H, Reiners W A, Likens G E, Delwiche C C, Botkin D B. The biota and the world carbon budget. Science, 1978, 199(4325) : 141-146. 被引量:1
  • 10Post W M, Emanuel W R, Zinke P J, Stangenberger A G. Soil carbon pools and world life zones. Nature, 1982, 298(5870) : 156-159. 被引量:1

二级参考文献251

共引文献638

同被引文献397

引证文献24

二级引证文献111

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部