期刊文献+

Critical deflagration waves leading to detonation onset under different boundary conditions

Critical deflagration waves leading to detonation onset under different boundary conditions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 High-speed turbulent critical deflagration waves before detonation onset in H2–air mixture propagated into a square cross section channel, which was assembled of optional rigid rough, rigid smooth, or flexible walls. The corresponding propagation characteristic and the influence of the wall boundaries on the propagation were investigated via high-speed shadowgraph and a high-frequency pressure sampling system. As a comprehensive supplement to the different walls effect investigation, the effect of porous absorbing walls on the detonation propagation was also investigated via smoke foils and the high-frequency pressure sampling system. Results are as follows. In the critical deflagration stage, the leading shock and the closely following turbulent flame front travel at a speed of nearly half the CJ detonation velocity. In the preheated zone, a zonary flame arises from the overlapping part of the boundary layer and the pressure waves, and then merges into the mainstream flame. Among these wall boundary conditions, the rigid rough wall plays a most positive role in the formation of the zonary flame and thus accelerates the transition of the deflagration to detonation(DDT), which is due to the boost of the boundary layer growth and the pressure wave reflection. Even though the flexible wall is not conducive to the pressure wave reflection, it brings out a faster boundary layer growth, which plays a more significant role in the zonary flame formation. Additionally, the porous absorbing wall absorbs the transverse wave and yields detonation decay and velocity deficit. After the absorbing wall, below some low initial pressure conditions, no re-initiation occurs and the deflagration propagates in critical deflagration for a relatively long distance. High-speed turbulent critical deflagration waves before detonation onset in H2–air mixture propagated into a square cross section channel, which was assembled of optional rigid rough, rigid smooth, or flexible walls. The corresponding propagation characteristic and the influence of the wall boundaries on the propagation were investigated via high-speed shadowgraph and a high-frequency pressure sampling system. As a comprehensive supplement to the different walls effect investigation, the effect of porous absorbing walls on the detonation propagation was also investigated via smoke foils and the high-frequency pressure sampling system. Results are as follows. In the critical deflagration stage, the leading shock and the closely following turbulent flame front travel at a speed of nearly half the CJ detonation velocity. In the preheated zone, a zonary flame arises from the overlapping part of the boundary layer and the pressure waves, and then merges into the mainstream flame. Among these wall boundary conditions, the rigid rough wall plays a most positive role in the formation of the zonary flame and thus accelerates the transition of the deflagration to detonation(DDT), which is due to the boost of the boundary layer growth and the pressure wave reflection. Even though the flexible wall is not conducive to the pressure wave reflection, it brings out a faster boundary layer growth, which plays a more significant role in the zonary flame formation. Additionally, the porous absorbing wall absorbs the transverse wave and yields detonation decay and velocity deficit. After the absorbing wall, below some low initial pressure conditions, no re-initiation occurs and the deflagration propagates in critical deflagration for a relatively long distance.
出处 《Chinese Physics B》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2015年第1期361-368,共8页 中国物理B(英文版)
基金 Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.51206182)
关键词 critical deflagration waves wall boundary condition zonary flame pressure waves critical deflagration waves wall boundary condition zonary flame pressure waves
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Ciccarellia G and Dorofeev S 2008 Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 34 499. 被引量:1
  • 2Lee J H S, Knystautas R and Freiman A 1984 Combustion and Flame 56 227. 被引量:1
  • 3Gamezo V N, Ogawa T and Oran E S 2008 Combustion and Flame 155 302. 被引量:1
  • 4Porowski R and Teodorczyk A 2013 Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 26 374. 被引量:1
  • 5Liberman M A, Ivanov M F, Kiverin A D, Kuznetsov M S, Chukalovsky A A and Rakhimova T V 2010 Acta Astronautica 67 688. 被引量:1
  • 6Zhang P G, He X M, Li J Z and Zhang J Z 2009 Journal of Aerospace Power 24 1236. 被引量:1
  • 7Han X, Zhou J and Lin Z Y 2013 Chin. Phys. B 21 124702. 被引量:1
  • 8Han X, Zhou J, Lin Z Y and Liu Y 2013 Chin. Phys. Lett. 30 051701. 被引量:1
  • 9New T H, Panicker P K, Lu F K and Tsai H M 2006 AIAA 2006-552. 被引量:1
  • 10Li Q, Fan W, Yan C J, Hu C Q and Ye B 2007 Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 20 9. 被引量:1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部