摘要
《隋书·经籍志序》"梁有五部目录"并非是指梁代有五种目录著作,而是指梁代有将书籍分为五个部类的目录著作;"五部目录"并不针对《隋志》簿录类著录的刘孝标《梁文德殿四部目录》而言,而是针对《七录序》中的刘孝标"文德殿目录"与祖暅"术数书目录"而言——《隋志序》将此二者合并理解为一种目录,该目录也就成了"五部目录",其著作层面的指向则是《古今书最》所载的《梁天监四年文德正御四部及术数书目录》;梁代并无"五部目录",将"文德殿目录"与"术数书目录"理解为一种目录并不符合实际,而是出于对《七录序》与《古今书最》的误读;刘孝标《梁文德殿四部目录》只有四部,并不包括祖暅《术数书目录》在内,也不是缺少了《术数书目录》的不全本,《隋志》将其著录为"四部"目录无误;《梁天监四年文德正御四部及术数书目录》与《隋志》著录的刘孝标《梁文德殿四部目录》不可等同;刘孝标《梁文德殿四部目录》或《梁天监四年文德正御四部及术数书目录》对阮孝绪《七录》的部类划分等没有影响。
The proposition that 'there are five bibliographies in the Liang Dynasty'in the preface to 'Treatise on Books'of Book of Sui did not mean that there were five kinds of bibliographical works in the Liang Dynasty,but that there was a bibliography which divided books into five categories.The'bibliography with five branches'was not connected to The Bibliography in the Four Branches of the Hall of Civilized Merits of Liang by Liu Xiaobiao collected in'Treatise on Books'of Book of Sui,but with the'bibliography of the Hall of Civilized Merits'by Liu Xiaobiao and'Bibliography of Divination Books'by Zu Geng collected in the preface to Seven Classifications of Books(Qi Lu).In the preface to'Treatise on Books',these two bibliographies were understood to be one,i.e.the'bibliography with five branches',which referred to The Imperial Bibliography of the Four Branches and Divination Books in the Year 505 recorded in The Best Books of All Times(Gujin Shuzui).There was not a'bibliography with five branches'in the Liang Dynasty,and it did not accord with the reality to interpret the'Bibliography of the Hall of Civilized Merits'and 'Bibliography of Divination Books'as one,but was out of the misunderstanding of the preface to Seven Classifications of Books and The Best Booksof All Times.There were only four branches in The Bibliography in the Four Branches of the Hall of Civilized Merits of Liang by Liu Xiaobiao,which neither included the 'bibliography of divination books'by Zu Geng,nor was the incomplete edition lack of the'bibliography of divination books',so it was correct for'Treatise on Books'of Book of Sui to record it as a bibliography of'four branches.'The Imperial Bibliography of the Four Branches and Divination Books in the Year 505 could not be equivalent to The Bibliography in the Four Branches of the Hall of Civilized Merits of Liangby Liu Xiaobiao,and those two bibliographies had no impact on the classification of book branches in Seven Classifications of Books by Ruan Xiaoxu.
出处
《文史哲》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第1期137-146,167-168,共10页
Literature,History,and Philosophy
基金
2009教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金“中国著名目录学家个案研究--姚振宗目录学研究”(编号:09YJC870026)的阶段性成果
