期刊文献+

定性比较分析与国际关系研究 被引量:53

Qualitative Comparative Analysis and International Relations Research
原文传递
导出
摘要 定性比较分析是社会科学领域中一种新兴的研究方法,由于它综合了定量研究与定性研究两种主流研究方法的优势,并且擅长处理社会现象中普遍存在的复杂因果关系,因此它已经在社会科学研究中得到了较为普遍的关注和应用。定性比较分析在具体运用过程中形成了清晰集分析、模糊集分析与多值分析三项主要分析技术,而且新的有关时序分析的技术也在开发之中。在国际关系学界,定性比较分析的应用成果主要集中在战争、冲突和威慑等传统安全研究领域。定性比较分析的实际操作过程可以分为研究设计、软件计算和结果表达三部分,每一部分都包含了若干特有的步骤和技巧。由于综合了定量分析和定性分析的优势并弥补了它们的明显缺陷,定性比较分析具有很强的方法优势,但仍存在案例敏感性高、条件变量的数量限制、变量取值缺乏客观标准、无法有效处理时序问题等不足。 Qualitative comparative analysis(QCA) is an emerging research method in social science research which has been widely applied in recent years for its combination of relative advantages of qualitative and quantitative analysis as well as its focus on complex causalities commonly observable in social relations.Three main techniquescrisp-set,fussy-sets,and multi-value QCA-have been developed during the evolution of this method while a newly time-series qualitative comparative analysis is still in progress.The applications of QCA techniques in the field international relations are primarily used in traditional security studies.In this paper,the author makes a detailed survey on the basic principles,mainstream techniques,and operational procedures of qualitative comparative analysis,and explores the status of the application of various QCA techniques in international relations.Although QCA is a promising research method in international relations studies,the author also points out that QCA still has some drawbacks to be overcome,especially the problem of case sensitivity,limited number of the conditional variables,objective standard of categorizing variables,as well as the difficulties of temporal analysis.
作者 刘丰
出处 《世界经济与政治》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期90-110,158-159,共21页 World Economics and Politics
关键词 定性比较分析 定性研究 定量研究 国际关系研究方法 qualitative comparative analysis qualitative research quantitative research international relations
  • 相关文献

参考文献77

  • 1Charles C. Ragin, The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies, Berkeley, University of California Press. 1987. 被引量:1
  • 2Charles C. Ragin, The Comparative Method: Mov- ing Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies, chs. 6-8. 被引量:1
  • 3丹尼尔·卡拉曼尼著,蒋勤译.《基于布尔代数的比较法导论》,上海:格致出版社、上海人民出版社2012年版. 被引量:1
  • 4Charles C. Ragin, Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008, pp. 23 -25. 被引量:1
  • 5Charles C. Ragin and Benoit Rihoux, "Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): State of the Art and Prospects," Qualitative Methods. Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section on Quali- tative Methods, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2004, p.6. 被引量:1
  • 6Daniel Maliniak, et al. , "International Relations in the US Academy," International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 55, No. 2, 2011, pp. 450-454. 被引量:1
  • 7Michael Breeher and Frank P. Harvey, eds. , Millennial Reflections on International Studies, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2002, pp. 345-478. 被引量:1
  • 8Detlef F. Sprinz and Yael Wolinsky-Nahmias, cds. , Mod- els, Numbers, and Cases: Methods for Studying International Relations, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2003, pp.1-14. 被引量:1
  • 9刘丰.实证主义国际关系研究:对内部与外部论争的评述[J].外交评论(外交学院学报),2006,23(5):96-102. 被引量:10
  • 10Emily Eakin, "Political Scientists Leading a Revolt, Not Studying One," New York Times, November 4, 2000, p.B. 11. 被引量:1

二级参考文献199

  • 1[美]亚历山大·温特.国际政治的社会理论[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2000.. 被引量:91
  • 2Detlef F Sprinz and Yael Wolinsky-Nahmias eds.,Models,Numbers,and Cases:Methods for Studying International Relations[C].Ann Arbor:The University of Michigan Press,2003. 被引量:1
  • 3Alexander L George and Andrew Bennett.Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Science[M].Cambridge,Mass:MIT Press,2005. 被引量:1
  • 4YosefLapid.The Third Debate:On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era[J].International Studies Quarterly,Vol.33,No.3(Sep.,1989). 被引量:1
  • 5[挪威]伊弗·B.诺伊曼,等.未来国际思想大师[M].肖峰,等译.北京:北京大学出版社,2003. 被引量:1
  • 6Steve Smith and Patricia Owens.Alternative Approaches to International Theory[A].in John Baylis and Steve Smith eds.,The Globalization of World Politics:An Introduction to International Relations[C].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2005. 被引量:1
  • 7Martin Hollis and Steve Smith.Explaining and Understanding International Relations[M].Oxford:Clarendon Press,1990. 被引量:1
  • 8K J Holsti.Mirror,Mirroron the Wall,Which Are the Fairest Theories of All?[J].International Studies Quarterly,Vol.33,No.3(Sep.,1989). 被引量:1
  • 9Mark Neufeld.Reflexivity and International Relations Theory[A].in Claire Turenne Sjolander and Wayne Cox eds.,Beyond Positivism:Critical Reflections on International Relations[C].Boulder,Colo.,Lynne Rienner Publishers,1994. 被引量:1
  • 10Andrew Moravcsik.Theory Synthesis in International Relations:Real Not Metaphysical[J].International Studies Review,Vol.5,No.l(Mar.,2003). 被引量:1

共引文献171

同被引文献905

引证文献53

二级引证文献1945

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部