摘要
近年,有学者相继发表《科学研究必须按科学规程操作——"夏商周断代工程"结题后的反思(三)》、《在反思中前行——为"夏商都邑暨偃师商城发现30年学术研讨会而作"》文章,断言"过去30年间围绕‘早商文化研究与夏文化探索’经历的曲折道路,已使人们的认识在转了一圈之后又回到了原点",郑亳说"崩盘"。然而,这样的断言因不符合证明规则,有违学术史而落空。
In recent years, some scholars have published articles one after another, such as Scientific Research Must be Operated According to Scientific Procedures-Self-examination After the Xia Shang Zhou Division Project had been Concluded （3rd）, Forward in Self-examination-Written for the Symposium about Xia and Shang Capital and Yanshi Mcdl which had been Found 30 Years. Assertion the tortuous experience around the early Shang culture research and the Xia culture exploration in the past 30 years, has made the people＇s understanding back to the origin, the viewpoint of Zheng Bo crash. However, this assertion fell through because it can not conform to the rules of proof and violate to the academic history.
出处
《南方文物》
2014年第4期37-47,共11页
Cultural Relics in Southern China
关键词
二里头文化
郑州商城
商都亳
夏商分界
Erlitou Culture, Zhengzhou mall, Shangdu Bo, Xia and Shang boundary
