期刊文献+

基于桥梁多灾害设计的典型桥梁实证分析 被引量:3

A typical bridge case study based on multi-hazard bridge design
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前美国的桥梁设计规范在考虑重力荷载和卡车荷载组合时分别采用1.25和1.75的系数,但是当考虑地震荷载作用时,取地震系数1.0,一般不考虑卡车荷载,特殊情况需要考虑时卡车荷载系数为0.5。这说明地震与卡车组合时候,其概率理论的不完备性。基于此,参考文献[16,17]不仅给出了地震和重卡车作用下的组合理论,还给出其共同作用下荷载系数的计算方法。本文的主要目的是用一个典型桥梁实例对求解的荷载系数进行检验。通过有限元软件对采用新的荷载系数的桥墩截面配筋进行重新设计,然后,对新桥进行地震作用下的pushover分析,并与现行LRFD规范的规定值进行对比。结果表明,新的荷载系数能够保证桥梁结构的安全,可以按其设计。 The current Guide Specification for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design uses 1. 25 for dead load and 1. 75 for truck load,but 1. 0 for earthquake alone or 1. 0 earthquake and 0. 5 times truck load for special conditions when considering earthquake effects,which indicates that the probabilistic theory for earthquake and heavy truck load combination is not complete. Based on which,papers[16,17]present the theory for their combination and the method for load factor calculation. The purpose of this paper is checking the load factor calculated by the new method using a typical bridge case study. The reinforcement of the bridge pier is redesign using the new load factors through element software. The pushover analysis of the redesign pier is carried on and the results are compared with those of LRFD. The results show that the new factor can ensure the safety of the bridge and can be employed in seismic bridge design.
出处 《世界地震工程》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第4期141-146,共6页 World Earthquake Engineering
基金 基本科研业务专项经费项目(批准号:2012A02) 国家自然科学基金(批准号:51308510)
关键词 多灾害 LRFD 荷载系数 失效概率 典型桥梁 实证分析 Multi-hazard LRFD Load factor Failure probability Typical bridge Case study
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1AASHTO Guide Specification for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design[ S], 1st Ed. , Washington, DC. , 2009. 被引量:1
  • 2AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications[ S] , 4th Ed. , Washington, D. C. , 2007. 被引量:1
  • 3Nowak A. S. ,Chan - Hee Park, J.R. Casas. Reliability Analysis of Prestressed Concrete Bridge Girders: Comparison ot Eurocode, 5panish NORMA lAP and AASHTO LRFD[ C]. Sth ASCE Specialty Conference on Probabilistic Mechanics and Structural Reliability. 2000. 被引量:1
  • 4Nowak A. S. , Hong Y. K.. Bridge Live Load Models [ J ]. ASCE Journal of Structural Engtneenng. 1991,117( 9). 被引量:1
  • 5R. M. Barker, J. M. Duncan, K.B. Pojiani et at.. Manuals for the Design of Bridge Foundations [R]. NCHRP Rep. 343, Transportation Re- search Board, National Research Council, Washington, D. C. , 1991. 被引量:1
  • 6Fred Moses. Calibration of Load Factors for LRFR Bridge Evaluation [ R ]. NCHRP 454 [ R ]. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D. C. , 2001. 被引量:1
  • 7Gongkang Fu, Ji You. Extrapolation for Future Maximum Load Statistics [ J . Journal of Bridge Engineering. 2011, 7/8:527 N 535. 被引量:1
  • 8Laramie WY, Newark DE. Simplified Live Load Distribution Factor Equations [ R]. NCHRP 592. Transportation Research Board, National Re- search Council, Washington, D. C. , 2007. 被引量:1
  • 9NCHRP. NCHRP Report 575 [ R]. Legal Truck Loads and AASHTO Legal Loads for Posting. 2007. 被引量:1
  • 10Lee, Liang, Shen, Shiuojuka. A Framework for Development of Multi - hazard Load and Resistance Factor Design [ R 1. MCEER Technical Re- port, 2011. 被引量:1

二级参考文献19

  • 1AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design specifications[S]. 4th ed. , Washington, D. C. , 2007. 被引量:1
  • 2AASHTO Guide specification for LRFD seismic bridge design [S]. 1st ed. , Washington, DC. , 2009. 被引量:1
  • 3Susan E Hida. Statistical significance of less common load combinations [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2007, 12 (3) :389 -392. 被引量:1
  • 4Novak A S. NCHRP Reporta. 368 :Calibration of LRFD bridge design code[ R ]. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D. C. , 1999. 被引量:1
  • 5Lee C. G. ,Liang Z. ,et al. A framework for development of muti-hazard load and resistance factor design[R]. MCEER Technical Report, 2012. 被引量:1
  • 6Melchers R E. Structural reliability:analysis and prediction[ M ]. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1999. 被引量:1
  • 7Armen Der Kiureghian. Non - ergodicity and PEER' s framework equation [ J ]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,2005,34 ( 13 ) : 1643 - 1652. 被引量:1
  • 8Soong T T. Fundamentals of probability and statistics for engineers [ M ]. State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA, 2004. 被引量:1
  • 9Moses F. Calibration of load factors for LRFD bridge evaluations [ R ]. NCHRP Rep. 454, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D. C. , 2001. 被引量:1
  • 10Lee C.G,Liang Z.et al.A framework for development of muti-hazard load and resistance factor design. MCEER Technical Report . 2012 被引量:1

共引文献31

同被引文献12

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部