期刊文献+

我国人文社会科学学科多样性研究 被引量:17

Study of Discipline Diversity in the Field of Chinese Humanities and Social Sciences
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文基于1998-2011年CSSCI期刊引文数据,从学科多样性的角度对中国人文社会科学跨学科属性进行分析。结果表明:布里渊指数能够较好反映学科引用和被引多样性,引用多样性方面民族学最高,语言学最低;被引多样性方面政治学最高,体育学最低。对综合多样性的分析可将中文社科23个学科划分为6个多样性水平,图书馆、情报与文献学处于低水平,对引用率和被引率的统计印证多样性分析结果是可靠准确的。最后针对图书馆、情报与文献学多样性水平较低的现状,给出了相应建议和展望。 Based on 1998-2011 journal citation data collected from CSSCI, this paper analyzes interdisci-plinarity of Chinese Humanities and Social Sciences from the perspective of discipline diversity. This pa-per provides a research perspective to study the holistic properties of Chinese Humanities and Social Sci-ences. The results show that Brillouin's Index is a proper indicator reflecting discipline diversity. For cit-ing diversity values, the highest is ethnology, and the lowest is linguistics. For cited diversity values, thehighest is politics, and the lowest is physical education. 23 disciplines of Chinese Humanities and SocialSciences can be divided into six diversity levels according to the synthesized diversity, among which li-brary and information science is at the low level. The statistics of citing and cited rate confirms that the re-sults are reliable. In addition, considering the low level of diversity in the field of library and informationscience, suggestions for future improving are also proposed.
出处 《情报科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期3-8,63,共6页 Information Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71173249)
关键词 人文社会科学 学科交叉 多样性 布里渊指数 CSSCI humanities and social sciences interdisciplinarity diversity brillouin's index CSSCI
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Klein J T. Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdis- ciplinary research: a literature review [J]. American Journal of Preventive Medicine,2008,35(2):116 - 123. 被引量:1
  • 2Stirling A. A general framework for analysing diversi- ty in science, technology and society [J]. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2007, 4(15): 707 - 719. 被引量:1
  • 3Narin F, Carpenter M, Berlt N C. Interrelationships of scientific journals [J]. Journal of the American Soci- ety for Information Science, 1972, 23(5): 323 - 331. 被引量:1
  • 4庞景安编著..科学计量研究方法论[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,1999:540.
  • 5Tomov D T, Mutafov H G. Comparative indicators of in- terdisciplinarity in modern science [J]. Scientomet- rics, 1996, 37(2): 267 - 278. 被引量:1
  • 6刘臣,张庆普,单伟,刘岩芳.学科知识流动网络的构建与分析[J].情报学报,2009,28(2):257-265. 被引量:30
  • 7刘臣,单伟,于晶.中国学科知识网络的演化研究——基于1981-2010年引文数据[J].系统工程理论与实践,2013,33(2):430-436. 被引量:12
  • 8赵星,谭旻,余小萍,闫现洋,叶鹰.我国文科领域知识扩散之引文网络探析[J].中国图书馆学报,2012,38(5):59-67. 被引量:56
  • 9Porter A L, Chubin D E. An indicator of cross-disci- plinary research [J]. Scientometrics, 1985, 8(3): 161 - 176. 被引量:1
  • 10Yu G, Wang M Y, Yu D R. Characterizing knowledge diffu- sion of Nanoscience & Nanotechnology by citation analysis [J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 84(1): 81 - 97. 被引量:1

二级参考文献70

共引文献140

同被引文献288

引证文献17

二级引证文献173

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部