摘要
自1995年中国花冈劳工诉日本鹿岛株式会社发端,中国民间对日索赔诉讼已历经18个春秋,诉讼案达31件,除4例和解外,终审无一胜诉。日本法院晚近判决中,驳回我国民间索赔的主要理由有二:一是据《中日联合声明》中国政府已放弃民间索赔;二是已过诉讼时效。据国际法理对上述理由剖析与审定,一方面可知以上二者均背离了国际法原则,进而可助益民间对日索赔走出困境。另一方面对维护我国受害者及其遗族的合法权益,彻底解决二战赔偿问题,根本矫正日本军国主义传统,亦具重大现实意义。
China＇s civil claims against Japan have gone through 31 lawsuits in 18 years since 1995 when Chinese granite workers sued the Japanese Kajima Corporation, without winning a single case except for 4 reconciliation cases. Japanese courts have rejected China＇s civil claims for two reasons. One is that the Chinese government has given up civil claims according to ＂The Sino-Japanese Joint Statement＂, the other being that the hmitation of civil claims has expired. A careful analysis shows that these two reasons violate the principles of international law, so it is necessary to help China＇s civil claims against Japan out of the legal predicament. On the other hand, it has great practical significance to protect the legitimate rights and interests of those victims and survivors, to resolve the compensation problem of World War II, and to correct Japanese militarism tradition.
出处
《四川大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第6期123-130,共8页
Journal of Sichuan University：Philosophy and Social Science Edition
基金
2011年教育部研究项目"中国民间对日索赔中的国际法问题研究--以重庆大轰炸受害者索赔为典型的实证分析"(11YJA820031)
关键词
民间对日索赔
诉讼实践
《中日联合声明》
China＇s civil claims against Japan, litigation practice, The Sino-Japanese Joint Statement
