期刊文献+

替吉奥联合奥沙利铂方案与紫杉醇联合奥沙利铂和5-氟尿嘧啶方案治疗晚期胃癌的疗效对比 被引量:1

Comparison of S-1 combined with oxaliplatine and paclitaxel and oxaliplat combined with 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨替吉奥联合奥沙利铂方案(SOX方案)和紫杉醇联合奥沙利铂和5-氟尿嘧啶方案(POF方案)治疗晚期胃癌的疗效和不良反应。方法收集2010年2月至2013年6月间晚期胃癌患者48例,分为SOX组和POF组,分别采用SOX方案(23例)和POF方案(25例)。至少完成2个周期化疗,比较两组患者的疗效和不良反应。结果 SOX组患者的有效率(RR)为47.8%,疾病控制率(DCR)为65.2%;POF组患者的RR为44.0%,DCR为68.0%,两组差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。SOX组患者的中位疾病进展时间(TTP)为7.2个月,中位总生存期(OS)为11.5个月;POF组患者的TTP为8.4个月,OS为12.3个月,两组差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。两组患者的不良反应也相似,以Ⅰ-Ⅱ级的血液学毒性和消化道反应为主。SOX组患者的血小板减少发生率高于POF组(P〈0.05),POF组患者脱发发生率高于SOX组(P〈0.05)。结论 SOX方案治疗晚期胃癌疗效与POF方案相似,耐受性好,应用更方便。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of S-1 combined with oxaliplatine (SOX) and paclitaxel and oxaliplat combined with 5-fluorouracil (POF) in the treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods Fourty-eight patients with advanced gastric cancer were enrolled into this study. They were divided into SOX group and POF group respectively. All patients received two cycles of chemotherapy at least. The efficacy and toxicity were evaluated. Results The treatment response rate (RR) in the SOX group and POF group was similar (47. 8% vs 44.0%, x^2 =0. 071, P 〉0. 05). The time to progression (TIP) in the SOX group and POF group was 7.2 mo and 8.4 mo respectively (P 〉0. 05). The overall survival (OS) in the SOX group and POF group was 11.5 mo and 12. 3 mo respectively ( P 〉 0.05). Thrombocytopenia in the SOX group were significantly higher than that in the POF group ( P 〈 0.05) ; Alopecia in the SOX group were significantly lower than that in the POF group ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion The response of SOX regimen for advanced gastric cancer is similar, and the toxicity of SOX is tolerable.
出处 《中国肿瘤临床与康复》 2014年第12期1489-1492,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology and Rehabilitation
关键词 胃肿瘤 替吉奥 药物治疗 联合 Gastric neoplasms S1 capsule Drug therapy, combination
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献30

  • 1秦叔逵,刘秀峰,张华.晚期胃癌三种一线化疗方案的临床比较研究[J].循证医学,2005,5(4):214-217. 被引量:13
  • 2孙清,毛永杰,赵伟,巢琳,杭晓声,常树建,王琦.卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂治疗晚期胃癌的随机对照临床研究[J].肿瘤防治研究,2005,32(11):729-730. 被引量:18
  • 3金懋林.抗癌新药治疗胃癌进展[M].北京:科学出版社,2000:55-64. 被引量:6
  • 4Kelesen D, Van de Velde C, Minsky B. Gastric cancer: clinical management. In: Kelsen D, Daly JM, Kern SE, et al. Gastroin-tes- tinal oneology [ M ] . Philadelphia: PA Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,2002. 408-416. 被引量:1
  • 5Vanhoefer U, Rougier P, Wilke H, et al. Final results of a random- ized phase Ⅲ trial of sequential high-dose metbotrexate,fluoroum- cil, and doxorubicin versus etoposide, leucovorin, and fluorouracil and eisplatin in advanced gastric caneer;A trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group [ J ]. J Clin Oneol, 2000, 18 : 2648- 2657. 被引量:1
  • 6Makt-Manino M, Malnino R. Clinical studies of three oral prodrug of 5-fluorouracil ( capecitabine, UFT, S-I ) : a review [ J ]. Oncologist ,2002,7 (4) :288-323. 被引量:1
  • 7Tanaka F, Fukuse T, wada H, et al. The history, mechanism and clinical use of oral 5-fluorouracil derivative chemotherapeutic a- gents [ J ]. Curr Pharm Biotechnol,2000,1 (2) : 137-164. 被引量:1
  • 8Shirasaka T, Shimamato Y, Ohshimo H, et al. Development of a novelfonn of an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative( S-1 )directed to the potentiation of the tumor selective cytotoxicity of 5-fl uorouracil by two biochemical modulators[ J ]. Anticancer Drugs, 1996,7 ( 5 ) : 548-557. 被引量:1
  • 9Shirasaka T, Tsukuda M, lnuyama Y, et al. New oral anti-cancer drug,Ts-1 (S-1)-form bench to clinic[ J]. Gall To Kagaku Ryo- ho,2001,28 (6) :855-864. 被引量:1
  • 10万德森.结肠癌辅助化疗的过去、现在和将来.临床肿瘤学现状,2006,3(2):12-13. 被引量:4

共引文献54

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部