期刊文献+

企业伪社会责任行为的动因研究 被引量:9

A Study of the Driving Factors of Enterprises' Pseudo-Social Responsibility Behaviors
原文传递
导出
摘要 以扎根理论为主要分析工具,整合相关文献,探讨了企业伪社会责任行为的动因。通过三级编码构建了企业伪社会责任行为的动因模型,共得到12个子范畴以及对应的外源性压力、内生性压力、舞弊容忍度3个主范畴。此外,结果也发现3个主范畴的作用路径不尽相同,其中,外源性压力是外部动因,内生性压力是内部动因,舞弊容忍度是情景动因。在此基础上,进一步讨论了研究结论及理论贡献,并给出了治理企业伪社会责任行为的管理建议。 Taking the grounded theory as the main analyzing tool, this paper makes use of the related literatures to explore the driving factors of enterprises' pseudo-social responsibility behaviors. It constructs a driving factors model of enterprises' pseudo-social responsibility behaviors with three-level coding, from which 12 sub-categories and 3 corresponding major-categories, namely external pressure, internal pressure and fraud tolerance, have been obtained. In addition, the results also indicate that the acting paths of the three main categories are not the same. In particular, the external pressure is external motivation, the internal pressure is internal motivation, and the fraud tolerance is situational motivation. On such basis, this paper gives further discussion on the research results and theoretical contributions, and then puts forward some management suggestions for the governance of enterprises' pseudo-social responsibility behaviors.
作者 赵红丹
出处 《当代财经》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第12期77-86,共10页 Contemporary Finance and Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71302047) 高等学校博士点专项科研基金项目(20133108120031) 上海市社科规划基金项目(2014EGL006) 上海市教育委员会"晨光计划"项目(13CG45)
关键词 社会责任 伪社会责任 道德伪善 动因 扎根理论 social responsibility pseudo-social responsibility moral hypocrisy driving factors grounded theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Porter M. E., Kramer M. R: The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility [J]. Har- vard business review, 2006, 84(12): 78-92. 被引量:1
  • 2Frooman J: Socially Irresponsible and Illegal Behavior and Shareholder Wealth: A Meta-Analysis of Event Studies[J]. Business & Society, 1997, 36(3): 221-249. 被引量:1
  • 3肖红军,张俊生,李伟阳.企业伪社会责任行为研究[J].中国工业经济,2013(6):109-121. 被引量:130
  • 4Carroll A. B: The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stake- holders [J]. Business Horizons, 1991, 34(4): 39-48. 被引量:1
  • 5Beers D., Capellaro C: Greenwash! [J]. Mother Jones, 1991, 16(2): 38-43. 被引量:1
  • 6Wagner T., Lutz R. J., Weitz B. A: Corporate Hypocrisy: Overcoming the Threat of Inconsistent Corporate Social Re- sponsibility Perceptions [J]. Journal of Marketing, 2009, 73(6): 77-91. 被引量:1
  • 7Fassin Y., Budens M: The Hypocrisy-Sincerity Continuum in Corporate Communication and Decision Making: A Model of Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics Practices [J]. Management Decision, 2011, 49(4): 586-600. 被引量:1
  • 8樊帅,田志龙,林静,王澜波.基于社会责任视角的企业伪善研究述评与展望[J].外国经济与管理,2014,36(2):2-12. 被引量:30
  • 9Brunsson N: The Consequences of Decision-Making [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. 被引量:1
  • 10Orlitzky M., Schmidt F. L., Rynes S. L: Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis [J]. Organiza-tion studies, 2003, 24(3): 403-441. 被引量:1

二级参考文献72

共引文献169

同被引文献134

引证文献9

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部