摘要
目的观察胸腔置管引流术治疗恶性胸腔积液的临床效果。方法将2010年3月—2013年9月我院因恶性胸腔积液住院患者151例,采用随机分组法分成2组,分别采用胸腔置管引流术和传统胸腔穿刺法进行治疗。总结分析2组患者不良反应、生存状况的差异。结果胸腔置管组患者不良反应少、生存质量相对较高。结论胸腔置管法治疗恶性胸腔积液效果明显优于单纯胸腔穿刺,值得推荐。
Objective To observe the curative effect of thoracic duct drainage in the treatment of malignant pleural effusion. Methods In 2010 March ~2013 year in July in our hospital for malignant pleural effusion in 151 cases of hospitalized patients, rando mLy divided into two groups, respectively, the chest tube drainage and traditional thoracic puncture method treatment . Summary of differences between two groups of patients survival analysis of adverse reactions. Results Two patients with chest tube adverse reaction of patients, quality of life is relatively less.Conclusion Chest tube method is better than the simple thoracentesis, worthy of recommendation.
出处
《基层医学论坛》
2014年第31期4178-4180,共3页
The Medical Forum
关键词
恶性胸腔积液
胸腔置管引流术
胸腔穿刺
对比观察
Malignant pleural effusion
Chest tube drainage
Thoracocentesis
Curative effect observation
