摘要
司法公正是一个人人都在言说,但处处不易实践的社会难题。站在不同的立场与角度,每个人对公正有着不同的理解与看法。根据最高人民法院提供的数据分析可见,法院本身、全国人大、社会公众对司法公正做出了差异较大的评价。对司法公正的不同评价有着文化观念、制度不足和机制错位等多方面的原因。在现代法治国家,社会各界应当对司法公正达成认识上的一致,否则司法公正这一词汇永远不能指代它所能代表的对象与观念。因此,司法公正需要理念上的倡导和实践上的型构,以弥合各界在认识上的差异。
Judicial justice is a thing that can be talked about by almost everyone,but it is at the same time a social issue difficult to put into practice.Judging from different perspectives,people’s interpretations and o-pinions about judicial justice vary.According to the analytical data offered by the Supreme Court,the Court it-self,the NPC and the public all have made different evaluations about it,which may have been due to different cultural values,deficient systems and lack of institutional mechanisms.In the modern states governed by law, the common understanding on judicial justice shall be reached between every social sectors,otherwise,the term“judicial justice”would never be able to fully display the objectives and concepts it represents.Therefore,con-ceptual advocating and pragmatic framing are needed to bridge the differences in the understanding of judicial justice.
出处
《昆明理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2014年第6期48-55,共8页
Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基金
最高人民法院2013年度审判理论重大课题"人民法院依法独立公正行使审判权保障研究"
关键词
司法公正
公正观
案件评估
程序理念
法治精神
judicial justice
concept of justice
case assessment
procedural conception
the rule of law
