期刊文献+

Euro-NCAP行人大腿新测试规程对前端造型和布置的影响 被引量:3

Euro-NCAP pedestrian upper leg new test protocol effect to the front end styling and packaging design
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2014年新颁布的8.0版欧盟新车评价规程(Euro NCAP)的测试规程,为行人安全对车辆设计做了重大调整。有鉴于此,该文总结了行人大腿保护测试规程变化前后的要点,对新老测试规程的差异进行了对比分析,采用新老两种测评方法,评估了对不同造型车型的设计,分析了这些变化给汽车前端造型、硬点布置以及发盖等结构设计所带来的影响。结果表明:新测评方法虽然降低了汽车前端造型设计的限制,但是对前端硬点布置以及结构设计提出了新的要求。该结论可为主机厂的汽车安全、布置、造型设计提供参考。 The new test protocol (Version 8.0) in 2014 by the Euro New Car Assessment Program (Euro NCAP) has some important updatings for pedestrian upper leg impact. This paper compares the differences between the new and old protocols, while analyzing the effect of these changes on pedestrian safety vehicle design. Two different car models were evaluated using the old protocol and the new protocol. The inlfuences were also analyzed on different vehicle front end styling design, different vehicle packaging, and different vehicle bonnet structure design. The results show that the new protocol has less limitation to vehicle front end styling design but more requirements for the vehicle front end hard points packaging and the vehicle structure design. These results can be used as guides for vehicle safety, packaging and styling design.
出处 《汽车安全与节能学报》 CAS CSCD 2014年第4期354-359,共6页 Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy
关键词 汽车安全 新车评价规程(NCAP) 欧盟NCAP 行人保护 大腿碰撞 汽车前端造型 汽车前端硬点布置 automotive safety New Car Assessment Protocol (NCAP) Euro NCAP pedestrian protection upper leg impact vehicle front end styling vehilce front end hard point package
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1刘军勇,王大志,陈国强,刘奇,汤晓东,王大勇.基于EuroNCAP的成人头部碰撞保护设计研究[J].上海汽车,2011(5):54-58. 被引量:2
  • 2刘军勇,刘奇,王大志.欧洲NCAP行人保护发展趋势及应对策略探讨[J].上海汽车,2013(12):57-59. 被引量:6
  • 3Yutaka O, Akihiko A, Masayoshi O. A study of the upperleg component tests compared with pedestrian dummytests [C]// 17th Inti Tech Conf ESV (Enha Safety of Vehi),Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2001, No. 11-0235. 被引量:1
  • 4Snedeker J G, Walz F H, Muser M H,et al. Assessingfemur and pelvis injury risk in car-pedestrian collisions:comparison of full body PMTO impacts, and a humanbody finite element model [C]// 19th Inf I Tech Conf ESV,Washington D C, USA, No.05-0103. 被引量:1
  • 5Hardy B J, Lawrence G J L, Knight I M, et al. A studyof possible future developments of methods to protectpedestrians and other vulnerable road users [R]. UnitedKingdom, TRL (Transportation Research Center) ProjectReport: UPR/VE/061/07, 2007, final version. 被引量:1
  • 6Lubbe N, Hikichi H, Takahashi H, et al. Review of theEuro NCAP upper leg test [C]// 22nd Int'l Tech Conf ESV,Washington D C,USA, 2011, No. 11-0137. 被引量:1
  • 7Oliver Z. Proposal for a modification of the bumper testarea for lower and upper legform to bumper tests [C]// 2ndMeeting of Informal Group GTR9 Phase 2, Japan, Osaka,2012. 被引量:1
  • 8David M. Study of vehicle-to-pedestrian interactions withFEM: Evaluation of upper leg test methods using a humanbody model [D]. Flemingsberg, Sweden: Royal Institute ofTechnology KTH STH, 2013. 被引量:1
  • 9UNECE (United Nation Economic Commission forEurope). Global technical regulation No. 9: PEDESTRIANSAFETY [S/OL]. [2009-01-26]. http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/main/wp29/wp29wgs/wp29gen/wp29registry/ECE-TRANS-180a9e.pdf. 被引量:1
  • 10EC (European Commission). Pedestrian protectionfeasibility study consultation response [S/OL]. [2004-08-19]. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/automotive/files/pagesbackground/pedestrianprotection/pedestrian-protection-feasibility-study-consultation-responses_en.pdf. 被引量:1

二级参考文献6

共引文献6

同被引文献8

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部