期刊文献+

经桡动脉行冠状动脉介入治疗的临床分析和疗效观察

Analysis of clinical efficacy of transradial approach for coronary interventional therapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨在临床工作中,经桡动脉途径行冠状动脉介入治疗(TRI)的优势以及可行性。方法对在2011年2月~2014年2月期间,我院收治的112例需行冠脉介入治疗(TRI)的患者的临床资料进行比对、分析,观察患者的手术成功率以及并发症。结果经桡动脉途径行冠状动脉介入治疗(TRI),穿刺成功有110例,成功率为98.21%,而术后并发症:桡动脉发生痉挛3例,术后穿刺部位出现小血肿有1例,前臂出现肿胀有1例,血管迷走痉挛1例,共有6例,并发症发生率为5.3%。结论经桡动脉途径行冠状动脉介入治疗(TRI),效果确切、安全性高、并发症较少,值得在临床推广。 Objective To investigate the advantages and feasibility of transradial intervention (TRI) in our clinical practice. Methods The clinical data of 112 patients who underwent TRI from February 2011 to February 2014 were compared and evaluated to investigate the success rate of surgery and complications. Results One hundred and ten cases had successful puncture, which corresponded to a success rate of 98.21%. Six patients (5.3%) developed postoperative complications including 3 cases of radial artery spasm, 1 case of small hematoma at the puncture site, 1 case of forearm swelling, and 1 case of vasovagal spasm. Conclusion TRI should be promoted in clinical practice because of its good efficacy, high safety, and low incidence of complications.
出处 《心血管病防治知识(学术版)》 2014年第11期41-42,共2页 Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease
关键词 冠状动脉 桡动脉 介入治疗 Coronary artery Radial artery Interventional therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献45

  • 1李小龙,张斌,李新建,丁明超,董鹏,王斌.桡动脉痉挛209例相关因素的分析[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(7):1983-1987. 被引量:8
  • 2屈健,项军,赵勇,何凌宇,崔云惠,张春香,毕玉洁,吴敏,张艳玲,徐卫东,叶福林,梅健,万向荣.75岁以上老年冠心病患者的冠状动脉介入治疗[J].东南国防医药,2007,9(2):88-90. 被引量:5
  • 3de Belder AJ,Smith RE,Wainwright RJ,et al.Transradial artery coronary angiography and intervenetion in patients with severe peripheral vascular disease.Clin Radiol,1997,52(2):115-118. 被引量:1
  • 4Mulukutla SR,Cohen HA.Feasibility and efficacy of transradial acess for coronary intervenetion in patients with acute myocardial infarction.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2002,57(2):167-171. 被引量:1
  • 5Kiemeneij,Laarman G.Percutaneous radial approach for coronary stent implantation.Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn,1993,30:173-178. 被引量:1
  • 6Smith SC J r,Dove JT,Jacobs AK,et al.ACC /AHA guidelines of percutaneous coronary interventions (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines) 22 executive summary.A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angiop lasty).J Am Coll Cardiol,2001,37:2 215-2 239. 被引量:1
  • 7Stella PR,Kiemeneij F,Laarman GJ,et al.Incidence and outcome of radial artery occlusion following transradial artery coronary angiography.Cathet Cardiovas Diagn,1997,40(2):156-158. 被引量:1
  • 8Wu SS,Galani RJ,Bahro A,et al.8 French transradial coronary interventions:clinical outcome and late effects on the radial artery and hand function.J Invasive Cardiol,2000,12:605-609. 被引量:1
  • 9Cox Nicholas,Resnic Frederic S,Popma Jeffreg J,et al.Comparison of the risk of vascular complications associated with femoral and radial access coronary catheterization procedures in obese versus nonobese patients.The American Journal of Cardiology,2004,94:1 174-1 177. 被引量:1
  • 10Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GG, de Benedictis ML, et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures: systematic overview and recta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004, 44: 349-356. 被引量:1

共引文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部