期刊文献+

中美跨境审计监管僵局的形成、内在矛盾与可能的合作模式 被引量:9

The Formation, Internal Contradiction and Cooperation Mode of Cross Border Audit Supervision Deadlock Between China and The US
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国政府坚持"长臂管辖"原则,要求对为美国上市公司提供审计服务的中国会计师事务所进行审查;而中国政府则坚持"完全信任"原则,拒绝让渡管辖权。从2010年浑水公司做空"中概股"导致"中概股"危机,到2014年SEC暂停"四大"中国分所的在美审计资格,中美跨境审计监管逐渐陷入僵局。通过分析发现,中美两国在法律制度、主权原则及合作需求等方面所存在的内在矛盾,是监管合作陷入僵局的本质原因。相应的建议包括:为美国监管机构设立有效的审计底稿调取通道;加快审计监管改革,争取获得美方的互信委托监管认可;对我国企业的海外上市,在降低上市门槛的同时加强监管。 The US government insists on the "long arm jurisdiction" principle, requiring that Chinese accounting firms who provide audit services for USA listed Corporations must be scrutinized; while Chinese government adheres to the "completely trust" principle, refusing to transfer the jurisdiction. From Muddy Water shorted China's stocks and resulted in the crisis of China's stocks in 2010, till 2014 the SEC suspended China Branches of Big 4 accounting firms' audit qualification in the USA, the cross-border auditing supervision has gradually come to a deadlock. This paper points out that the inherent contradictions between China and the United States, which exists in the legal system, the principle of sovereignty and cooperation demand, are the essential reasons for regulatory cooperation coming to a deadlock. Suggestions include: establishing effective transfer channel of audit papers for USA regulators; speeding up the audit supervision reform, struggling for the mutual trust regulatory approval of USA; and to Chinese corporations listed overseas, reducing the listing threshold, and at the same time strengthening supervision.
作者 李晟
出处 《河北经贸大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期113-117,共5页 Journal of Hebei University of Economics and Business
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"BaselⅢ框架下商业银行监管资本套利识别研究"(71303769) 天津市哲学社会科学规划基金项目"天津市养老金融产品创新研究"(tjyy11-2-076)
关键词 审计监管 跨境合作 “中概股” 审计底稿 上市公司 会计师事务所 中美跨境审计 主权原则 audit supervision cross border cooperation China's stocks audit papers listed companies accounting firm Sino US cross-border auditing sovereignty principle
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1PCAOB, Activity Summary and Audit Implications for Reverse Mergers Involving Companies from the China Region:January 1,2007 through March 31,2010,PCAOB Research Note # 2011-P1,p. 1,note 1,available at http ://pcaobus.org/Research/Documents/Chinese_Reverse_ Merger_Research_Note.pdf. 被引量:1
  • 2James S. Ang & Zhiqian Jiang & Chaopeng Wu,Good Apples,Bad Apples:Sorting Among Chinese Companies Traded in the US,at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2024826, Feb.14 2013. 被引量:1
  • 3Jan Jindra & Torben Voetmannb & Ralph A. Walklingc, Reverse Mergers:The Chinese Experience,Fisher College of Business Working Paper Series,WP 2012 -03 -018,2012. 被引量:1
  • 4Mark Humphery -Jenner, The Governance and Perfor- mance of Chinese Companies Listed Abroad:An Analysis of China's Merits Review Approach to Overseas List- ings,Journal of Corporate Law Studies,Vol. 12,2012. 被引量:1
  • 5Benjamin A. Templin,Chinese Reverse Mergers,Account- ing Regimes,and /he Rule of Law in China,Thomas Jef- ferson Law Review,No. 1,2011. 被引量:1
  • 6朱绵茂.论美国金融监管法律的域外适用——从SEC起诉德勤上海谈起[J].浙江金融,2012(8):36-39. 被引量:3
  • 7蔡婷贻,王真.中美"会计悬崖"[J].财经,2013,(1). 被引量:1
  • 8吕斌.中概股危机后遗症[J].法人,2013(1):34-39. 被引量:3
  • 9彭瑾.中美会计准则的差异及其原因分析[J].西部财会,2012(8):43-45. 被引量:7
  • 10Paul Gillis, CSRC comments on PCAOB/SEC tiff, at http ://www.chinaaccountingblog.com/weblog/csrc -com- ments-on-pcaobsec.html, Jan. 18,2013. 被引量:1

二级参考文献14

  • 1李军.略谈会计准则的中国特色[J].财会月刊(合订本),2001(4):18-18. 被引量:1
  • 2任夏仪,刘星.我国上市公司独立审计质量的博弈模型刻画及其分析[J].中国管理科学,2006,14(6):124-130. 被引量:11
  • 3克里斯托弗·诺比斯,罗伯特·帕克著.潘琰译.比较国际会计.,东北财经大学出版社,2002. 被引量:1
  • 4Armstrong, C. S., M. E. Barth, A. D. Jagolinzer, and E. J. Riedl. 2010. Market Reaction to the Adoption of IFRS in Europe. The Accounting Review, 85 (1), 31-61. 被引量:1
  • 5Barth, M. E. , W. R. Landsman, M. Lang, and C. Williams. 2012. Are IFRS- based and US GAAP- based Accounting A- mounts Comparable? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 54 (1) : 68 - 93. 被引量:1
  • 6Leisenring, J., T. Linsmeier, K. Schipper, and E. Trott. 2012. Business- model (intent) -based Accounting. Accounting and Business Research, 42 (3) : 329 - 344. 被引量:1
  • 7Zeff, S. A. 2012. The Evolution of the IASC into the IASB, and the Challenges it Faces. The Accounting Review, 87 (3) : 807 - 837. 被引量:1
  • 8财政部.中国注册会计师审计准则[S],201030-42. 被引量:1
  • 9Avinash Dixit;Susan Skeath;蒲勇健.策略博弈[M]{H}北京:中国人民大学出版社,2009334-364. 被引量:1
  • 10卢宁文.审计质量形成机理的博弈均衡分析[J]{H}审计与经济研究,2012(05):41-48. 被引量:1

共引文献65

引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部