摘要
關於《遼史》所見道宗"壽隆"年號,自錢大昕以來,學界雖早已認定此爲"壽昌"之誤,但皆知其然而不知其所以然。本文的研究表明,文獻所見"壽隆"、"壽昌"之紛歧,並非一個簡單的孰是孰非問題,它牽涉到一樁久已湮沒無聞的金朝避諱"壽昌"事例,這一發現不僅可爲金代史諱增添一個新的例證,更爲我們解開《遼史》"壽隆"年號的謎團提供了一把關鍵的鑰匙。
With regard to the Liao EmperorDaozong's reign title of"Shoulong(壽隆)"recorded in the Liao Shi(《遼史》),scholars since QianDaxin had already affirmed that it was a mistake from the genuine reign title of"Shouchang(壽昌)",but didn't know why. This paper finds that the different recordation of"Shoulong"and"Shouchang"in the documentation was not a simple yes or no question. It involved an unbeknown naming taboo of"Shouchang"existing in the Jin Dynasty.This discovery not only adds a new example to the naming taboo during Jurchen's reign,but also gives us a crucial key to solve the difficult problem why the reign title of"Shoulong"were written in the Liao Shi.
出处
《中华文史论丛》
CSSCI
2014年第4期211-228,共18页
Journal of Chinese Literature and History
基金
中國人民大學新教師啓動金項目“遼金政治制度研究”的階段性研究成果
